Skip to main content

Abstract

A main concern of economic theory is to explain how markets work. This task has been pursued recently with attention to details neglected in earlier studies. In addition, the scope of the investigation has been widened to address issues about the efficient organization of trade. The purpose of this exposition is to describe some of these developments.

The author is grateful for a Guggenheim Fellowship and for research support from the Office of Naval Research (ONR-N00014-79-C-0685) and the National Science Foundation (SES-81-08226) Thanks are due to John Roberts for help with Theorem 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baron, D. P., and R. B. Myerson (1982) ‘Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs’, Econometrica, 50 (July): 911–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K. (1982) ‘Incentive Compatability in Bargaining under Uncertainty’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 96 (November): 717–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K., and W. F. Samuelson (1979) ‘The Simple Economics of Bargaining’, Working Paper, Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, P. C. (1983a) ‘Bargaining with Incomplete Information: A Two Period Model with Continuous Uncertainty’, Technical Report 652, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, P. C. (1983b) ‘Bargaining with Incomplete Information: An Infinite Horizon Model with Continuous Uncertainty’, Technical Report 680, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aspremont, C., and L. A. Gerard-Varet (1979) ‘Incentives and Incomplete Information’, Journal of Public Economics, 11: 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, P. (1982) ‘Price-Quantity Strategic Market Games’, Econometrica, 50 (January): 111–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D., and J. Ledyard (1982) ‘A Theory of Price Formation and Exchange in Oral Auctions’, Technical Report 461, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University (March, revised July).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., and J. Tirole (1983) ‘Sequential Bargaining with Incomplete Information’, Review of Economic Studies, 50: 221–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresik, T. A., and M. A. Satterthwaite (1983) ‘The Number of Traders Required to Make a Market Competitive: The Beginnings of a Theory’, Technical Report 551, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University (February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, T. (1973) ‘Incentives in Teams’, Econometrica, 41: 617–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., and A. Raviv (1981) ‘A Theory of Monopoly Pricing Schemes with Demand Uncertainty’, American Economic Review, 71 (June) 347–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., and A. Raviv (1981) ‘Allocation Mechanisms and the Design of Auctions’, Econometrica, 49 (November) 1477–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., and R. M. Townsend (1981) ‘Resource Allocation under Asymmetric Information’, Econometrica, 49 (January) 33–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B. (1977) ‘On Incentives and Control in Organizations’, PhD thesis, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B., and R. B. Myerson (1981) ‘Efficient and Durable Decision Rules with Incomplete Information’, Technical Report 495, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C. (1980) ‘Competitive Bidding for Contracts under Alternative Auction Procedures’, Journal of Political Economy, 88: 433–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz, L. (1979) ‘Outcome Functions Yielding Walrasian and Lindahl Allocations at Nash Equilibrium Points’, Review of Economic Studies, 46: 217–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz, L., and D. Schmeidler (1978) ‘Construction of Outcome Functions Guaranteeing Existence and Pareto Optimality of Nash Equilibria’, Econometrica, 46: 1447–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, E., and J. G. Riley (1981) ‘Optimal Auctions with Risk Averse Bidders’, Technical Report 311, Department of Economics, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, S. (1983) ‘Selling to Risk Averse Buyers with Unobservable Tastes’, Journal of Economic Theory, 3092 ): 370–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. R., and R. J. Weber (1982) ‘A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding’, Econometrica, 50 (September) 1089–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B. (1979) ‘Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem’, Econometrica, 47 (January) 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B. (1981) ‘Optimal Auction Design’, Mathematics of Operations Research, 6 (February) 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B. (1982) ‘Two-Person Bargaining Problems with Incomplete Information’, Technical Report 527, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B., (1983) ‘Bayesian Equilibrium and Incentive Compatibility: An Introduction’, Technical Report 548, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University (February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B., and M. Satterthwaite (1981) ‘Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading’, Technical Report 469S, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C. R., and V. L. Smith (1978) ‘An Experimental Examination of Two Exchange Institutions’, Review of Economic Studies, 45: 133–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. G., and W. F. Samuelson (1981) ‘Optimal Auctions’, American Economic Review, 71 (June) 381–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. G., and R. Zeckhauser (1983) ‘Optimal Selling Strategies: When to Haggle, When to Hold Firm’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98 (2): 267–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. J., and A. Postlewaite (1976) ‘The Incentives for Price-Taking Behaviour in Large Exchange Economies’, Econometrica, 44 (January) 115–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D. (1980) ‘Walrasian Analysis via Strategic Outcome Functions’, Econometrica, 48 (November) 1585–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D. (1982) ‘A Condition Guaranteeing that the Nash Allocation is Walrasian’, Journal of Economic Theory, 28 (December) 376–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. L., (1976) ‘Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory’, American Economic Review, 66 (May) 274–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. L., (1982) ‘Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science’, American Economic Review, 72 (December) 923–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. L., A. Williams, W. K. Bratton and M. G. Vannoni (1982) ‘Competitive Market Institutions: Double Auctions vs Sealed Bid-Offer Auctions’, American Economic Review, 72 (March) 58–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, J., and O. Takahashi (1980) ‘A Multi-stage Model of Bargaining’, Technical Report 80–25, Department of Economics, University of California at San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. B. (1978a) ‘Competitive Exchange’, Econometrica, 46 (May) 577–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. B. (1978b) ‘Information, Efficiency, and the Core of an Economy’, Econometrica, 46 (July) 807–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. B. (1982) ‘Double Auctions’, Technical Report 391, IMSSS, Stanford University (June, revised December) to appear in Essays in Honor of Leonid Hurwicz, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. B. (1983) ‘Incentive Efficiency of Double Auctions’, Technical Report, 431, IMSSS, Stanford University (October).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1985 George R. Feiwel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, R. (1985). Efficient Trading. In: Feiwel, G.R. (eds) Issues in Contemporary Microeconomics and Welfare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06876-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics