Abstract
One of the most interesting and novel aspects of the Russian political scene after the spring of 1905 was the appearance of political groupings and movements that were collectively called, or called themselves, the ‘Right’. These were parties, leagues, unions or circles which professed their dedication to the historical principles of orthodoxy, autocracy and nationality, and whose members seemed inspired only by the wish to return to the status quo ante of a less contentious, less frustrating period of Russian history when every political impulse had come from above. They appeared to look back to a time when the state alone had effectively defended traditional interests and institutions and kept in check the economic and social turbulence which culminated in the Revolution of 1905. Yet for all its apparent nostalgia and immobilism, in spite of all its protests against the revolutionary changes taking place in politics and society, the Right and the very fact of its appearance as an organized public force marked a departure in Russian life. Not all these new advocates of autocracy and opponents of a ‘frivolous’ liberal tinkering with the historical structure of the state were disposed blindly to defend the existing establishment; nor were they necessarily a part of it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
See, for example, M. N. Pokrovskii, ‘Mir i reaktsiia’, in Pokrovskii (ed.) 1905-Istoriia revoliutsionnogo dvizheniia (Moscow-Leningrad: 1925) 2, pp. 237–41.
K. F. Golovin, Moi vospominaniia (St Petersburg: 1908–10) 2, p. 36.
V. Levitskii, ‘Pravye partii’ in L. Martov et al. (eds) Obshchestvennoe dvizhenie (St Petersburg: 1909–14) 3, p. 357; Viktorov and Chernovskii, Soiuz russkogo naroda, p. 3 (hereafter cited as SRN); Letopis Russkogo Sobraniia, May 1901, pp. 3–4.
RV, no. 5 (1906) p. 329; P. Almazov, Nasha revoliutsiia (Kiev: 1908) p. 670;
T. Emmons, The Formation of Political Parties (Cambridge, Massachusetts: 1983) p. 148.
N. I. Lazarevskii (ed.) Zakonodatetnye akty perekhodnogo vremeni 1904–1908 gg. (St Petersburg: 1909) 3rd edn pp. 18–23.
Levitskii, ‘Prawe partii’, p. 365; Slonimskii, ‘Nashi monarkhisty i ikh programmy’, VF, no. 5 (1907) p.257.
Von Laue, ‘Count Witte and the Russian Revolution of 1905’, ASFER 17, no. 1 (1958) p. 30.
Levitskii, ‘Pravye partii’, pp. 362–4, 371; Mech’, Sily Reaktsii, p. 60; V. N. Zalezhskii, Monarkhisty (Khar’kov: 1930) 2nd edn, pp. 14–20.
Zalezhskii, Monarkhisty, pp. 21–2; Pokrovskii, 1905 — Istoriia, pp. 238–41; Levitskii, ‘Pravye partii’, pp. 370–3; L. Bernstein, Les Cent Noirs (Paris: 1907) pp. 6–7, 34;
A. A. Kizevetter, Na rubezhe dvukh stoletii (Prague: 1929) p. 400. Not all these groups were merely casually collected pogrom bands. A few had pretensions of becoming more permanent organizations. Among them were the Bessarabian Patriotic League, founded in April; in Moscow, the Union of Like-Minded Men of all Classes, the Political Brotherhood, the Progressive-Nationalist Party (A. S. Shmakov, N. A. Naidenov, V. I. Ger’e, N. A. Khomiakov), the Club of the Union of Monarchists (B. V. Sturmer, V. I. Gurko, N. A. Pavlov) apparently .a precursor of the Fatherland Union. See Lg, ‘Momenty’, pp. 54–5.
Levitskii, ‘Pravye partii’, pp. 370–6; A. S. Izgoev, Russkoe obshchestvo i revoliutsiia (Moscow: 1910) p. 9;
A. Morskoi, Iskhodrusskoi revoliutsii 1905g. (Moscow: 1911) p. 53; RB, no. 9 (1905) p. 153;
Tikhomirov, ‘25 let nazad’ KA, 40 (1930) pp. 78–9.
L. Decle, The New Russia (London: 1906) pp. 230–5.
Gerassimofif, Der Kampf, pp. 215–30. On Dubrovin and the origins of his movement, cf. Nikol’skii, ‘Dnevnik’, KA, 63 (1934) p. 88; SRN, pp. 81–8; Löwe, Antisemitismus pp.88, 99.
Gurko, Features and Figures, p. 435; M. Hagen, Die Fntfaltung politischer Offentliehkeit in Russland (Wiesbaden: 1982) p. 235; Nikol’skii, ‘Dnevnik’, p. 86; SRN, pp. 34–7; Zimmerman, ‘ITie Right Radical Movement’, p. 121.
Levitskii. ‘Pravye partii’, pp. 382–9; RV, no. 3 (1906) pp. 298–302; N. S. Jagantsev, Perezhitoe (Petrograd: 1919) 2, p. 86; Zalezhskii, Monarkhisty, p. 55.
Slonismkii. ‘Nashy monarkhisty’, pp. 268–9; L. A. Velikhov, Svravnitefnaia tablitsa (St Petersburg: 1906).
See the 27 January 1906 appeal of the Russian Assembly, to which the URP subscribed, in RV, no. 3 (1906) p. 305, and a declaration of the URP quoted by N. D. Noskov, Okhranitel’nye i reaktsionnye partii (St Petersburg: 1906) p. 40.
V. Ivanovich (comp.) Rossiiskiia partii (St Petersburg: 1906) pp. 117–22; Levitskii, ‘Pravye partii’, p. 399. N. E. Markov, one of the prominent figures of the URP, testified in 1917 before an investigating commission of the Provisional Government that the majority view in the Union had always been for participation in the Duma. (Shchcgolev, Padenie, 6, pp. 176–8.) For the minority view, held by Dubrovin, see SRN. p. 56. The URP at this time made no concrete proposals as to how the land-hunger of the peasants could be satisfied. The statutes of 1906 merely suggested that resolution of this question should await a clear and uniform expression of peasant views.
R. Rexheuser, Dumawahlen und lokale Gesellschaft (Cologne: 1980) p. 10, gives the percentage of Right deputies in the first Duma as 1.4. There were fourteen Right deputies in that body (‘who called themselves “moderate” Rightists’) according to Spirin (Krushenie, p. 341) and sixteen according to Zimmerman, The Right Radical Movement’, p. 311). He describes three of these as being, in a formal sense, Right Radicals and two as having been elected by a local Right Radical-Octobrist coalition. The Classification of the remaining eleven deputies is justified on the basis of their own professions of support for Right Radical ideas, or on the judgement of different observers of these men as “extreme Rightists”.’ Rawson, ‘the Union of the Russian People’, pp. 202–3, calculates an average of Right votes for the country as a whole of 5 per cent but states that no URP or hard-core rightist candidate won election. Cf. L-g, ‘Momenty’, p. 61; Gerassimoff, Der Kampf, p. 113; Zalezhskii, Monarkhisty, p. 46.
G. V. Butmi, Rossiia na rasput’i (St Petersburg: 1906) p. 44; Levitskii, ‘Pravye partii’, pp. 398, 453–62; Rawson The Union of the Russian People’, p. 211; Spirin, Krushenie, pp. 161–2; SRN, p. 15; Zimmerman, ‘The Right Radical Movement’, pp. 334–5, 402–4.
Kryzhanovskii, Vospominaniia, p. 152; SRN, pp. 38–40; Diakin, Samoderzhavie, burzhuaziia i dvorianstvo (Leningrad: 1978) pp. 80–1; Zimmerman, The Right Radical Movement’, p. 121.
B. Pares, My Russian Memoirs (London: 1931) pp. 126, 214–15. On Stolypin’s attitude to the Right, see also Conroy, Stolypin, pp. 30–1;
A. V. Tyrkova-Williams, Naputiakh k svobode (New York: 1952) p. 359.
V. A. Sukhomlinov, Vospominaniia (Berlin: 1924) p. 179.
Copyright information
© 1986 Hans Rogger
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rogger, H. (1986). The Formation of the Russian Right: 1900–06. In: Jewish Policies and Right-Wing Politics in Imperial Russia. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06568-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06568-4_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06570-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06568-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)