Skip to main content

The radical challenge

  • Chapter
Trapped within Welfare

Part of the book series: Titles in the Crisis Points Series ((CRPOI))

  • 4 Accesses

Abstract

Radicalism in social work is an accumulation of social and political critiques from a variety of sources. The uneasy coexistence of these critiques results from the contradictory position in which radicals find themselves. The springboard of radicalism is a rejection of social work in any of its present forms as anything but an institutionalised substitute for the caring relationships which people in any predicament could expect and enjoy in a less exploitative society. On the other hand many radicals believe that those who are exploited or rejected by society should pursue their rights as forcefully as possible, and social work offers one method of helping them towards a position to do so. Radicals are also faced with having to earn a living themselves and resisting their own exploitation. The resulting contradictions make it difficult if not impossible to act consistently. Facing up to them, and simultaneously attempting to maintain open and honest relationships with clients in conditions which favour deceit, make radicalism a vulnerable and painful undertaking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

  1. This topic is discussed, all too briefly, by Eric Hobsbawm in the essay ‘Revolution and Sex’, in Hobsbawm, Revolutionaries (London: Quartet, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See the discussion in G. Pearson, The Deviant Imagination (London: Macmillan, 1975) ch. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For a brief English account, see Case Con 9 or Red Rat 5, both 1972. The S. P. K.’s own publications are S. P. K. — Aus der Krankheit eine Waffe Machen (Munich: Trikont, 1972); and Dokumentation, parts I and II (Heidelberg: Prolit-Buchvertrieb, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Kitson, Low Intensity Operations (London: Faber, 1971); see also J. McCuen, The Art of Counter-Revolutionary Warfare (London: Faber, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ted Clark and Dennis T. Jaffe, Towards a Radical Therapy (New York: Gordon and Breach, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crescy Cannan, ‘Welfare Rights and Wrongs’, in R. Bailey and M. Brake (eds), Radical Social Work (London: Arnold, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ron Bailey, The Squatters (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973). See also Mike Downing, ‘The Ideal Homes Myth’, Case Con 11, April 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Bryant, Professionals in the Firing Line’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 3, no. 2, Summer 1973, p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Ciacci, ‘Psychiatric Control’, in H. Bianchi, M. Simondi, 1. Taylor (eds), Deviance and Control in Europe (London: Wiley, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See J. Barter and D. Carter, ‘Climbing off the Fence’, Social Work Today, vol. 3, no. 10, 10 August 1972; A. Power, ‘Homes and Squatters’, New Society, no. 510, 6 July 1972; Inside Story, no. 5, September 1972; Case Con 8, July 1972, and 9, October 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For a simple but essential critical account of NALGO’s structure and the Whitley Council negotiating system, see Barry White, Whitleyism or Rank and File Action? (London: NALGO Action Group, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Z. Butrym, The Nature of Social Work (London: Macmillan, 1976) p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1983 Mike Simpkin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simpkin, M. (1983). The radical challenge. In: Trapped within Welfare. Titles in the Crisis Points Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06449-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics