Abstract
Radicalism in social work is an accumulation of social and political critiques from a variety of sources. The uneasy coexistence of these critiques results from the contradictory position in which radicals find themselves. The springboard of radicalism is a rejection of social work in any of its present forms as anything but an institutionalised substitute for the caring relationships which people in any predicament could expect and enjoy in a less exploitative society. On the other hand many radicals believe that those who are exploited or rejected by society should pursue their rights as forcefully as possible, and social work offers one method of helping them towards a position to do so. Radicals are also faced with having to earn a living themselves and resisting their own exploitation. The resulting contradictions make it difficult if not impossible to act consistently. Facing up to them, and simultaneously attempting to maintain open and honest relationships with clients in conditions which favour deceit, make radicalism a vulnerable and painful undertaking.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and references
This topic is discussed, all too briefly, by Eric Hobsbawm in the essay ‘Revolution and Sex’, in Hobsbawm, Revolutionaries (London: Quartet, 1977).
See the discussion in G. Pearson, The Deviant Imagination (London: Macmillan, 1975) ch. 3.
For a brief English account, see Case Con 9 or Red Rat 5, both 1972. The S. P. K.’s own publications are S. P. K. — Aus der Krankheit eine Waffe Machen (Munich: Trikont, 1972); and Dokumentation, parts I and II (Heidelberg: Prolit-Buchvertrieb, 1972).
F. Kitson, Low Intensity Operations (London: Faber, 1971); see also J. McCuen, The Art of Counter-Revolutionary Warfare (London: Faber, 1966).
Ted Clark and Dennis T. Jaffe, Towards a Radical Therapy (New York: Gordon and Breach, 1973).
Crescy Cannan, ‘Welfare Rights and Wrongs’, in R. Bailey and M. Brake (eds), Radical Social Work (London: Arnold, 1975).
Ron Bailey, The Squatters (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973). See also Mike Downing, ‘The Ideal Homes Myth’, Case Con 11, April 1973.
R. Bryant, Professionals in the Firing Line’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 3, no. 2, Summer 1973, p. 173.
M. Ciacci, ‘Psychiatric Control’, in H. Bianchi, M. Simondi, 1. Taylor (eds), Deviance and Control in Europe (London: Wiley, 1975).
See J. Barter and D. Carter, ‘Climbing off the Fence’, Social Work Today, vol. 3, no. 10, 10 August 1972; A. Power, ‘Homes and Squatters’, New Society, no. 510, 6 July 1972; Inside Story, no. 5, September 1972; Case Con 8, July 1972, and 9, October 1972.
For a simple but essential critical account of NALGO’s structure and the Whitley Council negotiating system, see Barry White, Whitleyism or Rank and File Action? (London: NALGO Action Group, 1975).
Z. Butrym, The Nature of Social Work (London: Macmillan, 1976) p. 60.
Copyright information
© 1983 Mike Simpkin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simpkin, M. (1983). The radical challenge. In: Trapped within Welfare. Titles in the Crisis Points Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06449-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06449-6_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-33956-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06449-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)