Skip to main content
  • 65 Accesses

Abstract

Giuseppe Prezzolini, one of the most distinguished Italian critics of his generation — he lived for one hundred years, and was active until the end, which came in 1982 — believed that the Italians, in unifying their country (1861), ‘deprived cultured Europeans of their second fatherland; Italy became a little competitor among other nations, and no longer the dream nation of those who already had their own country’. It must be added that Italy has had barely a century to build up a truly native literature. Carducci, greatly superior to D’Annunzio (qq.v.), did not acquire a European reputation. D’Annunzio did — but because of his decadent, fin de siècle (q.v.) Europeanness, not his Italianness. One of the more important thinkers of this century, Benedetto Croce (1866–1952), never succeeded in reaching a cosmopolitan audience: only his aesthetics are widely known outside Italy — but he treated almost every other subject under the sun. Furthermore, what D’Annunzio stands for is opposed to what Carducci stands for; it is more immediately impressive, but of less value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1985 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seymour-Smith, M. (1985). Italian Literature. In: Guide to Modern World Literature. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06418-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics