The POW Issue

  • Callum A. MacDonald

Abstract

The POW issue almost destroyed the prospects of an armistice. What had at first seemed a simple matter became entangled in national prestige and ideology. In theory, the question was covered by the Geneva convention of 1949. Although neither Pyongyang nor Beijing were signatories, both declared their intention of observing the Geneva code, North Korea in July 1950, China not until July 1952. Washington, an original signatory, did not ratify the convention until 1955, but announced at the beginning of the war that POW policy would be based on the Geneva rules.1 Article 118 of the convention called for the automatic repatriation of all POWs at the end of hostilities. This uncompromising language was originally endorsed by Washington as a weapon in the cold war. It was intended to embarrass the USSR, which continued to hold large numbers of axis POWs as forced labour for reconstruction after 1945.2 At Panmunjom, however, an ironic reversal of positions occurred. The communists invoked article 118, displaying a legal literalism which was never applied to other sections of the convention, while the US proposed a new principle, ‘non-forcible’ repatriation.

Keywords

Cage Expense Hull Straw Stake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 5.
    Dept of the Army, The Handling of POWs during the Korean War (hereafter Handling of POWs), Military History Office, Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff, G-3, June 1960, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    Ibid., pp. 5–10.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    William C. Bradbury and Samuel M. Meyers, ‘Socio-political Behavior of Korean and Chinese. A Historical Analysis’, in William C. Bradbury, Samuel M. Meyers and Albert D. Biderman (eds), Mass Behavior in Battle and Captivity. The Communist Soldier in the Korean War (Chicago, 1968) pp. 232–3.Google Scholar
  4. 14.
    Among many accounts see Robert Leckie, Conflict (New York, 1962) pp. 285–92; Rees, pp. 322–3;Google Scholar
  5. Mark Clark, From the Danube to the Yalu (London, 1954) pp. 55–70.Google Scholar
  6. 19.
    NSC 81/1, 9 September 1951, FR 1950, Vol. 7, pp. 712–21.Google Scholar
  7. 20.
    Kenneth K. Hansen, Heroes Behind Barbed Wire (New York, 1957) pp. 42–52.Google Scholar
  8. 21.
    Ibid., pp. 53–71, 80–8.Google Scholar
  9. 29.
    JCS memo, 8 August 1951, FR 1951, Vol. 7, Pt 1, pp. 792–4.Google Scholar
  10. 30.
    Acheson to Marshall, 27 August 1951, ibid., pp. 857–9; Lovett to JCS, 25Google Scholar
  11. 31.
    Memo by Webb, 29 October 1951, FR 1951, Vol. 7, Pt 1, p. 1073.Google Scholar
  12. 32.
    Nicholas Bethell, The Last Secret (London, 1976);Google Scholar
  13. Nikolai Tolstoy, Victims of Yalta (London, 1978).Google Scholar
  14. 34.
    Ridgway to JCS, 27 October 1951, FR 1951, Vol. 7, Pt 1, pp. 1068–71.Google Scholar
  15. 35.
    Ruffner, Memo for Acting Seccy, Undated November 1951, RG 330, SecDef CD092 Korea, Box 233, MMR; JCS to Lovett, 15 November 1951, FR1951, Vol. 7, Pt 1, pp. 1168–71.Google Scholar
  16. 36.
    William H. Vatcher, Panmunjom. The Story of the Korean Military Armistice Negotiations (New York, 1958) pp. 241–6.Google Scholar
  17. 39.
    Allan E. Goodman (ed.), Negotiating While Fighting. The Diary of Admiral C. Turner Joy at the Korean Armistice Conference (Stanford, 1978) pp. 258–9, 251–2.Google Scholar
  18. 40.
    Ibid., pp. 251–2.Google Scholar
  19. 41.
    Ibid., pp. 258–9.Google Scholar
  20. 42.
  21. 67.
    Phillip Deane, Captive in Korea (London, 1953) pp. 34–5;Google Scholar
  22. William L. White, The Captives of Korea: An Unofficial White Paper. Our Treatment of Theirs; Their Treatment of Ours (New York, 1957).Google Scholar
  23. 69.
    William F. Dean, General Dean’s Story (New York, 1954) pp. 107–8.Google Scholar
  24. 78.
    Albert D. Biderman, March to Calumny (New York, 1979) p. 119.Google Scholar
  25. 81.
    René Cutforth, Korean Reporter (London, 1952), p. 53.Google Scholar
  26. 83.
    Francis S. Jones, No Rice for Rebels (London, 1956) p. 33.Google Scholar
  27. 89.
    Telecon, 25 August 1950, RG 9, Telecons Numbers 62–78, Box 113, MACL; Edward Hunter, Brainwashing (New York, 1958) pp. 83–108; Interview, British Soldier.Google Scholar
  28. 99.
    Virginia Pasley, 22 Stayed (London, 1955).Google Scholar
  29. 103.
    Albert D. Biderman, March to Calumny (New York, 1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Callum A. MacDonald 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Callum A. MacDonald
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WarwickUK

Personalised recommendations