Skip to main content

The United States and the Third World: Motives, Objectives, Policies

  • Chapter
Third-World Conflict and International Security

Abstract

Gone are the days when the United States believed herself to be impervious to developments elsewhere and was convinced of the automatic relevance of her values as a model for other states. Gone, too, is her desire to remake the world in her own image; damage limitation now prevails over universalism. Entangling alliances are now shunned not merely because of the risks inherent in alliances but also because of doubts about whether the United States has in fact anything to contribute in regions which she finds complicated to understand and onerous to deal with. This self-doubt extends to the use of military force, to the widespread, nagging doubt about whether she can wield it at all, particularly in situations of ambiguity in which goals are unclear, victory hard to define and success elusive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Kenneth Thompson, ‘The Ethics of Major American Foreign Policies’, British Journal of International Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2 (July 1980), p.122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson, op. cit., in n.l, pp. 121–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raymond Aron, The Imperial Republic (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1975), p. 302 (on which 1 rely in this section).

    Google Scholar 

  4. ibid., p. 306

    Google Scholar 

  5. ibid., p. 312.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Though not isolationist, the mood had much in common with detachment. But, unlike the old isolationism, which held that the United States was too good for international affairs, the new feeling was that Americans were not good enough. See Norman Podhoretz, The Present Danger (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stanley Hoffman’s criticism of the Carter Administration, on the first points, in New York Review of Books, 30 January 1980, p. 24, and

    Google Scholar 

  8. of Kissinger, on the complexity of his foreign policy, in Primacy or World Order (New York: McGraw Hill, 1978), p. 79, therefore seems curious.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For example, see Peter Jay, ‘Regionalism as Geopolitics’, Foreign Affairs (America and the World1979), January 1980, p. 488.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jay, op. cit., p. 511.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stanley Hoffmann, Primacy or World Order, op. cit. in n. 11, pp. 14–28.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hedley Bull, ‘Kissinger: The Primacy of Geopolitics’, International Affairs, vol. 56, no. 3, (Summer 1980), p. 486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. See, for example, Tom Farer, ‘The US and the Third World: A Basis for Accommodation’, Foreign Affairs, (October 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Robert Tucker, ‘America in Decline: The Foreign Policy of “Maturity”’, Foreign Affairs (America and the World1979), January 1980, and

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Inequality of Nations (New York: Basic Books, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tom Farer, ‘Searching for Defeat’, Foreign Policy, no. 40 (Fall 1980), pp. 155–74.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Robert Tucker, ‘America in Decline’, op. cit. in n. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  18. For a thoughtful discussion of ‘cost-free’ policies, see Thomas Hughes, ‘The Crack-Up’, Foreign Policy, no. 40 (Fall 1980), pp. 33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  19. On the difficulties in El Salvador, see William Leo Grande and Carla Anne Robbins, ‘Oligarchs and Officers’, Foreign Affairs (Summer 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  20. For various approaches, see Roger D. Hansen, Beyond the North-South Stalemate (New York: McGraw-Hill/Council on Foreign Relations, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  21. See also his ‘North-South Policy — What’s the Problem?’, Foreign Affairs (Summer 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  22. For a discussion of the interrelationship between the political supremacy of the United States and her economic position, see Robert Gilpin, US Power and the Multinational Corporation (London: Macmillan, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  23. ibid., p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  24. p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1982 The International Institute for Strategic Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chubin, S. (1982). The United States and the Third World: Motives, Objectives, Policies. In: Bertram, C. (eds) Third-World Conflict and International Security. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06312-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics