The Role of Biological Sciences in Nursing Education

  • Jack C. Hayward
  • Justus A. Akinsanya
Chapter

Abstract

An examination of the literature in nursing shows that curriculum development has been a comparatively neglected area in nursing research. This is particularly true of what Inman (1975) described as the ‘root of practical nursing in other sciences’ especially the behavioural and biological sciences. There is evidence to show that nursing had for a long time relied on a medically derived model of care. However, the need for definition and identification of appropriate criteria of safety and competence in nursing had been recognised. The RCN/DHSS Research Projects (Series 1 and 2), McFarlane (1970) and Inman (1975), highlighted some of these problems. These derive fundamentally from the lack of a distinct body of knowledge on which nursing practice could be based. McFarlane (1977) was concerned about this and noted:

‘It is a sobering thought that many of the nursing texts for students are prescriptive about nursing practice without any scientific validity other than the sanctification of ritual.’

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bendall, E. (1976). J. adv. Nurs., 1, 1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Copeland, W. L. et al. (1976). J. Contin. Educ. Nurs., 7, 4, 10–15Google Scholar
  3. DHSS (1972). Report of the Committee on Nursing (Chairman: Asa Briggs), Cmnd 5115, HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Hayward, J. C. and Akinsanya, J. A. (1980). Nursing Times, 76, 10, 427–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hockey, L. (1978). J. adv. Nurs., 3, 571–582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Inman, U. (1975). Towards a Theory of Nursing, Concluding Monograph: RCN/DHSS Project, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Lancaster, A. (1972). Nurse Teachers: The Report of an Opinion Survey, Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  8. Mallick, M. J. (1977). Nursing Outlook, 25, 4, 244–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. McFarlane, J. K. (1970). The Proper Study of the Nurse, RCN, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. McFarlane, J. K. (1977). J. adv. Nurs., 3, 261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nolan, R. J. (1973). The development of teaching method in human biology within nurse training schools (an unpublished MEd Thesis, University of Manchester)Google Scholar
  12. Ogier, M. E. (1981). Occasional Papers, Nursing Times, 77, 11, 41–43Google Scholar
  13. Sheahan, J. (1977). Curriculum development in nursing education, Nursing Mirror, 144 (3), 53–55Google Scholar
  14. Sheahan, J. (1978). J. adv. Nurs., 3, 515–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sheahan, J. (1979). J. adv. Nurs., 4, 647–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sheahan, J. (1980). J. adv. Nurs., 5, 71–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Swenden, L. et al. (1977). J. Biocommun., 4, 2, 10–14Google Scholar
  18. Thomas, B. A. (1979). Int. J. Nurs. Stud., 16, 229–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thouless, R. H. (1969). Map of Educational Research, NFERGoogle Scholar
  20. White, M. B. and Coburn, D. (1977). Nursing Outlook, 25, 10, 644–649PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilson, K. J. W. (1975). A Study of the Biological Sciences in Relation to Professional Nursing, Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  22. The General Nursing Council for England and Wales (1975). Teachers of Nurses Reports 1 and 2Google Scholar
  23. The Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom (1981). Report of a Working Party on Teachers of NursesGoogle Scholar
  24. Department of Health and Social Security (1970). Report of the Nurse Tutor Working Party, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jack C. Hayward and Justus A. Akinsanya 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack C. Hayward
  • Justus A. Akinsanya

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations