Skip to main content

Abstract

The contributors to this volume have dealt with a variety of legislatures from a variety of angles and employing a variety of sources — published proceedings, interview data, the daily press and specialist journals. They have nonetheless had, broadly speaking, a common focus and point of departure: the widely prevalent Western stereotype by which legislatures in the communist states are seen as negligible, ‘rubber stamp’ institutions with a purely propagandist role, their proceedings pertaining more to the realm of theatre than to that of politics. It is perhaps the single most important conclusion of this volume that this stereotype has been found seriously misleading, not just in what may be regarded as exceptional cases such as Yugoslavia and Poland, but in the case of most of the communist legislatures considered in this volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1982 Daniel N. Nelson and Stephen Leonard White

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, S. (1982). Some Conclusions. In: Nelson, D., White, S. (eds) Communist Legislatures in Comparative Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06086-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics