Advertisement

Abstract

The impact of Stolypin’s coup on the trade union movement was both immediate and devastating. In 1907 alone, 159 trade unions were closed down and the closures were to continue. In 1908, 101 were closed, 96 in 1909 and in 1910 a further 88. Over the five-year period 1907–12, some 604 unions were refused legal registration, 206 union activists were imprisoned and 357 were given terms of administrative exile.1 In those unions that did survive closure, and the most important of these were in Petersburg, there was a catastrophic decline in membership during 1908. Consequent on this decline, the unions had to abandon any pretence they had had during the days of freedom to lead the workers’ economic struggle. They were forced to seek a new role. The drop in union membership was therefore only partly a result of fear of arrest or the sack, but resulted also from apathy caused by the initial lack of direction shown by the unions in the immediate post-coup years.

Keywords

Trade Union Textile Worker Central Committee Central Bureau Social Democratic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    Elnitskii, op. cit., p. 285.Google Scholar
  2. Also D. Antoshkin Kratkii ocherk professionalnogo dvizheniya v Rossii (Moscow, 1928) p. 42.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    See the regular feature ‘Iz zhizni i deyatelnosti soyuza’ in the Metal Workers’ journal for the year in question. Also ‘Tsifrovye dannye o razvitii soyuza v 1908’, Edinstvo no. 1, 10 Feb 1909.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    See ‘Iz zhizni i deyatelnosti soyuza’ and also ‘Dvizhenie chlenov za pervoe polugodie 1908’, Nadezhda no. 1, 31 July 1908.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    See ‘Iz zhizni i deyatelnosti soyuza’;Google Scholar
  6. also Semenov-Bulkin, Na zare profdvizheniya, p. 349.Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    This is the view held by Semenov-Bulkin (see Afar zare profdvizheniya, p. 199). Certainly there was no suspicion of him being a provocateur during the years 1906–9, whereas after his arrest in November 1909 and exile to Moscow in 1910, there were countless rumours. Whether he started working for the police after his first arrest of 1909 or his subsequent detention in May 1910 is hard to say, but events during that May detention are worth commenting on. Malinovsky had to explain to one of his fellow detainees how it was that he was to be released. ‘He said that Colonel Madatov had told him that his work in the unions was known, that the government had nothing against it, and that if Malinovsky gave his word of honour not to take part in the activities of revolutionary parties he could go free’ (D. Sverchkov, Na zare revolyutsii (Leningrad, 1925) p. 276). Whether this was simply a rather weak excuse to explain his release, or whether he was alluding to the deal he had done with the authorities, is impossible to say.Google Scholar
  8. 6.
    ‘Iz zhizni i deyatelnosti soyuza’, Edinstvo no. 2, 5 March 1909. See also Elwood, Roman Malinovsky: a Life without a Cause. Semenov-Bulkin says of Malinovsky, he ‘was the soul of the union, he did much to develop it and strengthen it … under his leadership was educated the first cadre of young union activists’. Bulkin described in detail how Malinovsky used to visit every branch and district meeting. (See his Na zare profdvizheniya, pp. 199, 200.)Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    See ‘Iz zhizni i deyatelnosti soyuza’ for May 1908 and Feb 1909. Also ‘Perepiska Pravdy s Peterburgskimi rabochimi’, Pravda no. 4, 14/2 June 1909.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    I. D. Levin, ‘Rabochie kluby v Peterburge, 1907–14’, Materialy vol. 3, pp. 90–3.Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    ‘Iz zhizni i deyatelnosti soyuza’, Kuznets no. 7, 14 Feb 1908;Google Scholar
  12. V. O. Tsederbaum (signed G-g), ‘O kulturno-prosvetitelnoi deyatelnosti sredi rabochikh’, Golos sotsial demokrata no. 10/11, Nov/Dec 1908.Google Scholar
  13. 10.
    P. Kolokolnikov, ‘V Peterburge v 1907 g’, Materialy vol. 5, p. 145;Google Scholar
  14. Istoriya rabochikh Leningrada (Leningrad, 1972) p. 373;Google Scholar
  15. Borshchenko, Profsoyuzy SSSR: dokumenty i materialy; ‘Po Rossii’, Golos sotsial demokrata no. 8/9, July/Sept 1908.Google Scholar
  16. 11.
    Tsederbaum, op. cit., p. 53.Google Scholar
  17. 12.
    For accounts of the Congress of People’s Universities, see N. I. Kats, ‘Rabochie gruppy na vserossiiskikh legalnykh sezdakh, 1907–10’, Istoriya SSSR no. 5, 1966, pp. 91–2;Google Scholar
  18. ‘Pervyi sezd narodnykh universitetov’, Kuznets no. 5/6, 19 Jan 1908;Google Scholar
  19. ‘Pervyi sezd narodnykh universitetov’, Professionalnyi vestnik no. 17/18, 12 Jan 1908;Google Scholar
  20. P. Kolokolnikov, ‘V Peterburge v 1907’, Materialy vol. 5, p. 151. See also the protocols of the congress itself; Trudy pervogo vserossiiskogo sezda deyatelei obshchestvenno-narodnykh universitetov i drugikh prosvetitelnykh uchrezhdenii (Petersburg, 1908).Google Scholar
  21. 13.
    See ‘Iz zhizni partii’, Tovarishch no. 365, 5 Sept 1907;Google Scholar
  22. F. D. Kretov, Borba V. I. Lenina za sokhranenie i ukreplenie RSDRP v gody Stolypinskoi reaktsii 1907–10 (Moscow, 1969) pp. 44–5. For the trade union-coop commission, see Borshchenko, op. cit., p. 203; Barchugov, Revolyutsionnaya rabota bolshevikov v legalnykh rabochikh organizatsiyakh, 1907–11, p. 181;Google Scholar
  23. ‘Vechera vospominanii’, Materialy vol. 4, p. 44. The members of this commission seem to have included N. A. Rozhkov, I. P. Goldenberg-Meshkovskii, N. A. Skrypnik, V. P. Nogin, Zinoviev and Kamenev.Google Scholar
  24. 14.
    ‘Vechera vospominanii’, op. cit., p. 20.Google Scholar
  25. 15.
    Ibid. and S. Kanatchikov, Istoriya moego bytiya book 2 (Moscow, 1934) p. 67.Google Scholar
  26. 16.
    I. Goldenberg-Meshkovskii (signed I. G.), ‘Ocherednoi vopros’, Vestnik professionalnogo dvizheniya no. 1, April 1908.Google Scholar
  27. 17.
    ‘Vechera vospominanii’, op. cit., p. 20;Google Scholar
  28. ‘Moskovskii rabochii deputat R. V. Malinovsky’, Pravda no. 159, 3 Nov 1912.Google Scholar
  29. 18.
    N. A. Skrypnik (signed Georgii Erv), ‘Kooperativnyi sezd i profsoyuzy’, Vestnik professionalnogo dvizheniya no. 1, 1908.Google Scholar
  30. See also ‘Rezolyutsiya Ts.K. o kooperativakh’, Proletarii no. 25, 25/12 March 1908;Google Scholar
  31. ‘Po Rossii’, Golos sotsial demokrata 6/7, May/June 1908.Google Scholar
  32. 19.
    See Pervyi vserossiiskii kooperativnyi sezd; Trudy (Moscow, 1908). The details of the internal disagreements of the group could only be published abroad.Google Scholar
  33. See N. A. Skrypnik (signed G.E.), ‘Kooperativnyi sezd i rabochie kooperativy’, Proletarii no. 33, 23 July/5 Aug 1908;Google Scholar
  34. M. Broido (signed M. Bragin), ‘Moskovskii kooperativnyi sezd’, Vestnik rabochikh po obrabotke metalla no. 1, 15 May 1908.Google Scholar
  35. 20.
    Barchugov, op. cit., pp. 21 and 37.Google Scholar
  36. 21.
    Goldenberg-Meshkovskii pointed this out in his report to the ‘Proletarii Meeting’ that will be discussed in the next chapter. See Protokoly soveshchaniya rasshirennoi redaktsii ‘Proletarii’, pp. 82–3.Google Scholar
  37. 22.
    Pisma P. B. Akselroda i Yu.O. Martova, p. 177, note 2.Google Scholar
  38. 23.
    ‘Profsoyuzy i S.D. partiya’, Proletarii no. 17, Oct 1907.Google Scholar
  39. 24.
    K. Ostroukhova, ‘Otzovisty i ultimatumisty’, Proletarskaya revolyutsiya no. 29, 1924. Gapon was not in fact a police agent despite the many rumours.Google Scholar
  40. 25.
    See N. V. Kuznetsov, ‘Partiya i profsoyuzy v gody reaktsii’, Voprosy istorii KPSS no. 4, 1958, p. 92. For contemporary comment see ‘Iz zhizni i deyatelnosti obshchestva’, Fabrichnyi Stanok no. 1/2, 29 May 1908;Google Scholar
  41. and a report in Vestnik po obrabotke metalla no. 1, 15 May 1908.Google Scholar
  42. 26.
    Kuznetsov, op. cit., p. 99;Google Scholar
  43. ‘Khronika’ in Proletarii no. 36, 16/3 Oct 1908 and no. 42, Feb 1909.Google Scholar
  44. 27.
    See Perazich, N. I. Lebedev, p. 32;Google Scholar
  45. ‘Vechera vospominanii’, Materialy vol. 4, pp. 21–2;Google Scholar
  46. ‘R. V. Malinovskii’, Metallist no. 23, 1912.Google Scholar
  47. 28.
    Istoriya rabochikh Leningrada, p. 346.Google Scholar
  48. Kollontai, Iz moei zhizni i raboty, pp. 111–13.Google Scholar
  49. 29.
    For these preparations for the congress see Kats, op. cit., pp. 93–4;Google Scholar
  50. ‘Vserossiiskii zhenskii sezd i rabochaya grappa’ (signed M. B.), Professionalnyi vestnik no. 21, 24 Jan 1909;Google Scholar
  51. E. Yatsimirskaya, ‘Rabotnitsa v pervom zhenskom sezde’, Neva no. 12, 1958, pp. 180–1.Google Scholar
  52. 30.
    See Kollantai, op. cit.;Google Scholar
  53. Barchugov, op. cit., p. 268;Google Scholar
  54. Kollontai (signed A. Mikhailovna), ‘Zhenshchina rabotnitsa na pervom femininskom kongresse v Rossii’, Golos sotsial demokrata no. 12, March 1909;Google Scholar
  55. ‘Khronika’, Golos sotsial demokrata no. 10/11, Nov/Dec 1908.Google Scholar
  56. 31.
    ‘Rabochaya gruppa na zhenskom sezde — pismo iz Peterburga’, Sotsial demokrat no. 4, April 1909.Google Scholar
  57. 32.
    Iz deyatelnosti Ts.K.’, Sotsial demokrat no. 2, 28/10 Feb 1909;Google Scholar
  58. Golubkov, ‘Iz epokhi reaktsii’, p. 123.Google Scholar
  59. 33.
    O. A. Kogan (Ermanskii), ‘Pervyi zhenskii sezd’, Dal no. 2, 1 Jan 1909;Google Scholar
  60. E. D. Kuskova, ‘Zhenskii vopros i zhenskii sezd’, Obrazovanie no. 2, 1909;Google Scholar
  61. ‘Zhenskii sezd i rabochaya gruppa — pismo iz Peterburga’ (signed W), Golos sotsial demokrata no. 12, March 1909.Google Scholar
  62. 34.
    Kollontai, ‘Zhenshchina rabotnitsa …’. The Trudy of the congress are full of examples of the Socialist content of the group’s message. See Trudy pervogo vserossiiskogo zhenskogo sezda pri Russkom Zhenskom Obshchestve v St. Peterburge (Petersburg, 1909) pp. 274, 288–9, 310 and many more.Google Scholar
  63. 35.
    ‘Peterburgskoe pismo’, Pravda no. 11, 18/31 March 1910.Google Scholar
  64. 36.
    Ibid, and ‘Pravda svoim chitatelem’, Pravda no. 1, 3 Oct 1908.Google Scholar
  65. 37.
    Kretov, op. cit., p. 97.Google Scholar
  66. 38.
    Ocherki istorii Leningradskoi organizatsii KPSS vol. 1, p. 253;Google Scholar
  67. ‘Khronika’, Sotsial demokrat no. 2, 28/10 Feb 1909; ‘Khronika’, Proletarii no. 42, Feb 1909.Google Scholar
  68. 39.
    See two articles by F. I. Dan, ‘Posle buri’, Golos sotsial demokrata no. 1/2, Feb 1908 and ‘Na sovremennuyu temu’, Golos sotsial demokrata no. 8/9, July/Sept 1908.Google Scholar
  69. 40.
    Otchet kavkazskoi delegatsii ob obshchepartiinoi konferentsii (Paris, 1909) p. 30.Google Scholar
  70. 41.
    Ibid., p. 33.Google Scholar
  71. 42.
    N. K. Krupskaya, Memories of Lenin (London, 1970) p. 167.Google Scholar
  72. 43.
    Lidtke, op. cit., p. 98.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Geoffrey Swain 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey Swain

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations