Displacement by Technological Progress in the USSR (Social and Educational Problems and their Treatment)

  • Anna-Jutta Pietsch
  • Heinrich Vogel

Abstract

The labour force of industrialized nations is subject to a constant process of restructuring. This is true for Western industrialized societies as well as for the Soviet Union. The origins of this process are to be found in two interrelated developments:
  1. (1)

    Technological progress leads to an increase in labour productivity. This means that the same quantity of goods is produced with fewer workers because the output capacity of capital equipment is increased, or certain jobs are no longer needed due to mechanization and automation.

     
  2. (2)

    The increasing national product brought about mostly by rising labour productivity is, as a rule, not used in the same way as the national product generated in the past. As individual and collective prosperity of the nation increases, the structure of demand for goods and services changes likewise.

     

Keywords

Europe Transportation Rubber Income Expense 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    D. M Gallik et al., ‘The 1972 input-output table and the changing structure of the Soviet economy’, in Soviet Economy in a Time of Change (Washington, 1979) pp. 423–71.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    N. A. Aitov, Tekhnicheskii progress i dvizhenie rabochikh kadrov (Moscow, 1972) p. 21.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    T. A. Baranenkova, Vysvobozhdenie rabochei sily i uluchshenie ee ispol’zovaniia pri sotsialisme (Moscow, 1974) p. 105.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    B. Lutz and F. Weltz, Der zwischenbetriebliche Arbeitsplatzwechsel (Frankfurt/Main, 1966) p. 67.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    A. J. Pietsch, in W. Gumpel (ed.), Arbeits-und Sozialpolitik in der Sowjetunion (Munich, 1976) p. 102.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    E. Mueller et al., Technological Advance in an Expanding Economy: its Impact on a Cross Section of the Labour Force (Ann Arbor, 1969) p. 10.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    R. Uffhausen, Die Auswirkungen der demographischen Entwicklung auf das Wirtschaftswachstum and die Effizienz der sektoralen Arbeitskrafte-Allokation in der Sowjetunion (Research paper of Osteuropa-Institut no. 76) (Munich, 1981).Google Scholar
  8. 20.
    M. Sonin, Sotsialisticheskii trud, no. 3 (1977) p. 100.Google Scholar
  9. 25.
    V. Sozinov, Sotsialisticheskii trud, no. 10 (1976) p. 91.Google Scholar
  10. 26.
    V. I. Terebilov, Kommentarii k zakonodatel’stvu o trude (Moscow, 1975) p. 93.Google Scholar
  11. 28.
    Cf. A. I. Stavceva, Pravovye voprosy pereraspredeleniia trudovykh resursov (Moscow, 1974) p. 17.Google Scholar
  12. 29.
    Reallocation plans’ are developed on the basis of plans for the introduction of labour-saving measures into the enterprises and from individual interviews with the workers liable to displacement (cf. B. D. Breev, Methods of Planning Employment in the USSR (Moscow, 1979) pp. 57–9).Google Scholar
  13. 30.
    Already in 1975 the proportion of charges against displacement in the total number of legal cases because of termination of employment before the respective courts was 16.9 per cent (cf. O. Luchterhandt, UN-Menschenrechtskonventionen, Sowjetrecht — Sowjetwirklichkeit (Baden-Baden, 1980) p. 43).Google Scholar
  14. 31.
    A. E. Kotliar and V. V. Trubin, Problemy regulirovaniia pereraspredeleniia rabochei sily (Moscow, 1978) pp. 38–40.Google Scholar
  15. 34.
    P. Stiller, ‘Probleme and Methoden der Arbeitskraftelenkung’ (unpublished manuscript, Munich, 1980).Google Scholar
  16. 35.
    E. Smirnov, Sotsialisticheskii trud, no. 3 (1978) p. 110.Google Scholar
  17. 39.
    J. Delamotte, Shchekino, entreprise sovietique pilote (Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
  18. 41.
    For example, R. Blauner, Alienation and Freedom (Chicago/London, 1964)Google Scholar
  19. 41.
    A. Touraine, L’evolution du travail ouvrieur aux usines Renault (Paris, 1955).Google Scholar
  20. 42.
    H. Kern and M. Schumann, Industriearbeit und Arbeiterbewusstsein (Frankfurt/Main, 1970).Google Scholar
  21. 43.
    For example, S. Ia. Batushev, Sovetskaia pedagogica, no. 8 (1971) pp. 11 et seq.Google Scholar
  22. 43.
    W. N. Turtshenko, Sowjetwissenschaft, Gesellschaftswissenschaftliche Beitrage, no. 8 (1973) pp. 11 et seq.Google Scholar
  23. 43.
    M. N. Rutkevich and F. P. Filippov, Sotsial’naia struktura razvitogo sotsialisticheskogo obshchestva v SSSR (Moscow, 1970).Google Scholar
  24. 46.
    H. Wiegmann, Die Entwicklung der sowjetischen Berufsstruktur, Research paper of the Osteuropa-Institut, Munchen (1975).Google Scholar
  25. 50.
    Cf. e. g. G. M. Safranov, Trudovye reservy (Kisinev, 1972) p. 56.Google Scholar
  26. 51.
    M. Baethge et al., Produktion und Qualifikation (Hannover, 1976) p. 112.Google Scholar
  27. 52.
    V. A. Jadov, in M. Yanowitch (ed.), Soviet Work Attitudes (New York, 1979) p. 8.Google Scholar
  28. 53.
    V. G. Aseev, Preodelenie monotonnosti truda v promysh’lennosti (Moscow, 1974) p. 7.Google Scholar
  29. 56.
    M. Feshbach, ‘The structure and composition of the Soviet industrial labour force’, The USSR in the 1980’s (Brussels: NATO, 1978) p. 59.Google Scholar
  30. 57.
    A. J. Pietsch, Die Interdependenz von Qualifikationsbedarf und Arbeitsorganisation, Research paper from Osteuropa-Institut, Munchen, no. 63 (1980).Google Scholar
  31. 58.
    Studies carried out in Leningrad have already shown that graduates of intermediate vocational schools in jobs that are not commensurate with their qualifications have a poorer performance record than the less highly qualified graduates from the traditional type of vocational-technical schools (cf. O. O. Shkaratan, O. V. Stakanova and O. V. Filipovna, Sotsiologicheskie isledovaniia no. 4 (1977) pp. 39 et seq.).Google Scholar
  32. 60.
    Cf. M. Tatur, ‘Vergleich der Politiken zur Modernisierung der Arbeitsorganisation in der UdSSR, Polen und der CSSR’ (unpublished manuscript, 1980).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jan Adam 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna-Jutta Pietsch
  • Heinrich Vogel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations