Patientization of the Population

  • Richard Taylor
Chapter

Abstract

The contemporary medical establishment appears bent on converting the entire population of the industrialized countries into patients. This is notwithstanding the fact that most of us are normal and healthy most of the time, and that most of the illnesses we suffer from are trivial and self-limited and would recover without medical treatment. Rather than concentrate on the grave environmental, economic and social causes of the serious diseases which do afflict modern man, the medical establishment have, because of their clinical and scientific orientation, turned these diseases into individual biological and psychological problems which are destined to be dealt with on a one-to-one basis within the doctor-patient relationship.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

I: The Process

  1. 1.
    Thomas, L., ‘The health care system’, N Engl J Med, 293:1245, 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar

II: Screening and the Medical Check-up

  1. 1.
    McKeown, T., ‘An approach to screening policies’, J Roy Coll Phys, 10:145, 1976Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilson, J., ‘Some principles of early diagnosis in general practice’ in Surveillance and Early Diagnosis in General Practice, G. Teeling-Smith (ed), Office of Health Economics, London, 1966Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    World Health Organization, ‘Mass Health Examination’, WHO Public Health Paper No. 45, 1971Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spitzer, W. & Brown, B., ‘Unanswered questions about the periodic health examination’, Ann Int Med, 83:257, 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Teeling-Smith, G., ‘The economics of screening’ in C. R. Hart (ed), Screening in General Practice, Churchill Livingstone, London, 1975Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collen, M. et al, ‘Cost analysis of a multi-phasic screening programme’, N Engl J Med, 280:1043, 1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Olsen, D. et al, ‘A controlled trial of multi-phasic screening’, N Engl J Med, 294:925, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garfield, S., ‘Multi-phasic health testing and medical care as a right’, N Engl J Med, 283:1087, 1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burnum, J. (letter), ‘The worried sick’, Ann Int Med, 88:572, 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schor, S. et al, ‘Evaluation of the periodic health examination’, Ann Int Med, 61:999, 1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knox, E., ‘Multi-phasic screening’, Lancet, 2:1434, 1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Percy-Robb, et al, ‘Biochemical screening programme in general practice: a clinical follow-up’, Br Med J, 1:596, 1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anderson, F., ‘Evaluation of the routine physical examination of infants in the first year of life’, Ped, 45:950, 1970Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Korvin, C. et al, ‘Admission screening: clinical benefits’, Ann Int Med, 83:175, 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dunbridge, T. et al, ‘An evaluation of multi-phasic screening on admission to hospital’, Med J Aust, 1:703, 1976Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holland, W., ‘Screening for disease: taking stock’, Lancet, 2:1494, 1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chamberlain, J., ‘Evaluation of screening procedures’ in W. Hobson (ed), The Theory and Practice of Public Health, Oxford University Press, London, 1975Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Delbanco, T. (ed), ‘The periodic health examination revisited’, Ann Int Med, 83:271, 1975Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Conn, R., ‘Clinical laboratories: profit centre, production industry or patient care resource?’, N Engl J Med, 298:422, 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boonstra, C. & Jackson, C., ‘The clinical value of routine serum calcium analysis’, Ann Int Med, 57:963, 1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meador, C., ‘The art and science of non-disease’, N Engl J Med, 272:92, 1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Atkinson, A. & Kellett, R., ‘Value of intravenous urography in the investigation of hypertension’, J Roy Coll Phys, 8:175, 1974Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    O’Sullivan, J. & Hurwitz, D., ‘Spontaneous remissions in early diabetes mellitus’, Arch Int Med, 117:769, 1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O’Sullivan, J. & Williams, R., ‘Early Diabetes in perspective: population study in Sudbury, Mass.’, J Am Med Ass, 198:579, 1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Sullivan, J. & Mahan, C., ‘Prospective study of young diabetics’, N Engl J Med, 278:1038, 1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    UGDP, ‘Effects of hypoglycaemic agents on vascular complications of diabetes in patients with adult onset diabetes’, J Am Med Ass, 217:777, 1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Illich, Ivan, Medical Nemesis, Calder & Boyars, London, 1975Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mahler, H., ‘Health — a demystification of medical technology’, Lancet, 2:829, 1975Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Breslaw, L. & Somers, A., ‘The lifetime health monitoring programme’, N Engl J Med, 296:601, 1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thomas, L., ‘Notes of a biology watcher: “your very good health”’, N Engl J Med, 287:761, 1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carter, R., ‘The value of screening in paediatrics’, J Roy Coll Phys, 10:153, 1976Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Freda, V. et al, ‘Prevention of Rh Haemolytic disease — ten years clinical experience with Rh immune globulin’, N Engl J Med, 292:1014, 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Editorial, ‘Uncertainties of cervical cytology’, Br Med J, 4:501, 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lloyd, G., ‘Cervical cytology’ in C. Hart (ed), Screening in General Practice, Churchill Livingstone, London, 1975, p. 317Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Randall, K, ‘Cancer screening by cytology’, Lancet, 2:1303, 1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Walton et al, ‘Cervical cancer screening programmes’, Can Med Ass J, 114:1003, 1976Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Editorial, ‘Walton report on cervical screening’, Lancet, 1:1337, 1976Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Susser, M. & Watson, W., ‘Culture and Health’ in Sociology in Medicine, Oxford University Press, London, 1971, p. 55Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Editorial, ‘Screening for cervical cancer’, Br Med J, 2:659, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Massachusetts Dept. of Public Health, ‘Papanicolaou Testing — are we screening the wrong women?’, N Engl J Med, 294:223, 1976Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brindle, G. et al, ‘Cervical smears: are the right women being examined?’, Br Med J, 1:1196, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Spriggs, A. & Husain, O., ‘Cervical smears’, Br Med J, 1:1516, 1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Enos, W. et al, ‘Coronary disease among United States’ soldiers killed in action in Korea’, J Am Med Ass, 152:1090, 1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Enos, W. et al, ‘Pathogenesis of coronary disease in American soldiers killed in Korea’, J Am Med Ass, 158:912, 1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Report of working party, ‘Prevention of coronary heart disease’, J Roy Coll Phys, 10:232, 1976Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    VA study group, ‘Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension’, J Am Med Ass, 202:1028, 1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    ibid, 213:1143, 1970Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Editorial, ‘Lipid lowering drugs after myocardial infarction’, Lancet, 1:501, 1975Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Coronary Drug Project Research Group, ‘Clofibrate and niacin in coronary heart disease’, J Am Med Ass, 231:360, 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dayton, S. et al, ‘A controlled clinical trial of a diet high in unsaturated fat in preventing complications of atherosclerosis’, Circ, 40 Supp 2, 1969Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Meittinen, M. et al, ‘Effect of cholesterol-lowering diet on mortality from coronary heart disease and other causes’, Lancet, 2:835, 1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gray, N. & Hill, D., ‘Patterns of tobacco smoking in Australia’, Med J Aust, 2:327, 1977Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Leader, S. et al, ‘Cigarette smoking in Sydney schoolchildren aged 12 to 13 years: 1971 to 1975’, Med J Aust, 1:325, 1977Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Final Report, ‘National diet-heart study’, Circ, 37, Supp 1, 1968Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Meade, T. et al (letter), ‘Prevention of coronary heart disease’, Lancet, 1:269, 1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mann, G. (letter), ‘Prevention of coronary heart disease’, Lancet, 1:63, 1974Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mann, G., ‘Diet-heart: end of an era’, N Engl J Med, 297:644, 1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Tudor Hart, J., ‘Ischaemic Heart Disease’ in C. Hart (ed), Screening in General Practice, Churchill Livingstone, London, 1975, p. 199Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Glueck, C. et al, ‘Diet and coronary heart disease: another view’, N Engl J Med, 298:1471, 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Editorial, ‘Symptoms in hypertension’, Br Med J, 1:433, 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Langfield, S., ‘Hypertension: Deficient care of the medically served’, Ann Int Med, 78:19, 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Podell, R. and Gray, L., ‘Hypertension and compliance: implications for the primary physician’, N Engl J Med, 294:1120, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hayes, R. et al, ‘Improvement of medication compliance in uncontrolled hypertension’, Lancet, 1:1265, 1976Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    D’Souza, M. et al, ‘A long term controlled trial of screening for hypertension in general practice’, Lancet, 1:1228, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Moore, P. (ed), ‘Breast self-examination’, N Engl J Med, 299:304, 1978Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Shapiro, S. et al, ‘Role of periodic breast cancer screening in reducing mortality from breast cancer’, J Am Med Ass, 215:1777, 1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Greenberg, D., ‘X-ray mammography — background to a decision’, N Engl J Med, 295:379, 1976Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bailar, J., ‘Mammography: a contrary view’, Ann Int Med, 84:77, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wanebo, C. et al, ‘Breast cancer after exposure to the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki’, N Engl J Med, 279:667, 1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Editorial, ‘Radiation-induced breast cancer’, Br Med J, 1:191, 1977Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Massachusetts Dept. of Public Health, ‘Mammography — a question’, N Engl J Med, 294:395, 1976Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sadowsky, N. et al, ‘Radiologic detection of breast cancer’, N Engl J Med, 294:37, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Enthoven, A., ‘Cutting cost without cutting the quality of care’, N Engl J Med, 298:1229, 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Carbone, P. (ed), ‘A lesson from the mammography issue’, Ann Int Med, 88:703, 1978Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    British Breast Group, ‘Screening for breast cancer’, Br Med J, 3:357, 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Thier, S., ‘Breast-cancer screening: a view from the outside’, N Engl J Med, 297:1063, 1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar

III: ‘The Art and Science of Non-disease’

  1. 1.
    Meador, C., ‘The Art and Science of Non-disease’, N Engl J Med, 272:92, 1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergman, A. & Stamm, S., ‘The morbidity of cardiac non-disease in schoolchildren’, N Engl J Med, 276:1008, 1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wood, P., Diseases of the heart and circulation, Eyre & Spottiswoode, London, 1968, p. 595Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cayler, G. et al, ‘The effect of cardiac “non-disease” on intellectual and perceptual motor development’, Br Heart J, 35:543, 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar

IV: The Phenomenon of ‘Medicalization’

  1. 1.
    Stolley, P. et al, ‘Drug prescribing and use in an American community’, Ann Int Med, 76:537, 1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Editorial, ‘Antibiotics and respiratory illness’, Br Med J, 3:1, 1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Editorial, ‘Cough suppressants for children’, Br Med J, 2:493, 1976Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thomas, K., ‘The consultation and the therapeutic illusion’, Br Med J, 1:1327, 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahler, H., ‘Health — a demystification of medical technology’, Lancet, 2:829, 1975Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trethowan, W., ‘Pills for personal problems’, Br Med J, 3:749, 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Editorial, ‘Benzodiazephines: use, over-use, misuse, abuse’, Lancet, 1:1101, 1973Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Editorial, ‘Comfort without drugs’, Br Med J, 3:367, 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nightingale, S. et al, (eds), ‘Inappropriate prescribing of psychoactive drugs’, Ann Int Med, 83:896, 1975Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Richard Taylor 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Taylor

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations