Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Differential Game of Intra-CMEA Trade and Pricing.

  • Chapter
Topics in Trade Coordination of Planned Economies

Part of the book series: Vienna Institute for Comparative Economic Studies ((VICES))

  • 3 Accesses

Abstract

In selecting the approach and apparatus for our model of inter-CMEA trade and pricing, our preference is for those of a differential game. The question may then be validly asked: why specifically this type of game? In answer we would point to its two features relevant for the problem we are dealing with:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Footnotes

  1. Cf. inter al. Alfred Zauberman, Differential Games and Game Theoretic Topics in Soviet Literature 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Myoken, ‘“Non-zero-sum” differential games for the balance-of-payments adjustments in an open economy’, International Journal of Systems Sciences, no. 6, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. O.A. Malafeyev, Doklady USSR Academy of Sciences, 1973 vol. 213, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.R. Kleindorfer, M.R. Sertel, in Journal of Optimization Theory and Application, vol. 14, no. 6, December 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu.A. Flerov, “Multilevel Dynamic Games”, Journal of Cybernetics, vol. 3, no. 1, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Simon, Econometrica 1956

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Theil, ibidem, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Theil, Optimal Decision Rules for Government and Industry, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Malinvaud, Econometrica, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.M. Young, Econometrica, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Tintner, J.K. Sengupta, Stochastic Economics, 1972, p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C.T. Leondes, D. Stuart, “Stochastic Differential Games with Complexity-Constrained Strategies”, IEEE, Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-February 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Zauberman, “The Objective Function Revisited” in Jahrbuch der Wirtschaft Osteuropas volume 1, 1970, Munich-Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N.N. Moiseyev, Kibernetika, no. 6, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  15. John C. Harsanyi, “A General Solution for Finite Non-cooperative Games, Based on Risk Dominance” in M. Dresher, L.S. Shapley, A.W. Tucker, (eds.), Advances in Game Theory, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R.J. Aumann, M. Maschler, “The Bargaining Set of Cooperative Games”, Advances in Game Theory, Princeton 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Blaquière, L. Juricek, K.E. Wiese, “Geometry of Pareto Equilibria in N-person Differential Games” in A. Blaquière (ed.), Topics in Differential Games 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A.W. Starr, Y.C. Ho., “Nonzero-sum Differential Games”, in Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, no. 3, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  19. V.N. Burkov, V.I. Opoitsev, Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, no. 1, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Y.C. Ho and I. Blau, “A Simple Example of Informativeness and Performance” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 1973, pp. 437ff.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Basar, Y.C. Ho, “Informational Properties of the Nash Solutions of Two Stochastic Non-zero-sum Games”, Journal of Economic Theory, no. 4, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See also for a discussion by these authors in related context: Y.C. Ho, I. Blau, T. Bazar, “A Tale of Four Information Structures” in the 1974 Rocquencourt Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cf. M. Simaan and J.B. Cruz, “Stackelberg Strategy for Games with Many Players”, IEEE Transactions AC-18, 1973; also

    Google Scholar 

  24. H.B. Cruz Jr. “Survey of Nash and Stackelberg Equilibrium Strategies in Dynamic Games”, Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, no. 2, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  25. E.B. Yanovskaya, “Kriterii optimalnosti v bezkoalitsyonnykh igrakh”, in E. Vilkas, (ed.), Uspekhi Teorii lgr Vilnyus, 1973; cf. also Zauberman, Differential Games, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R.J. Aumann, “Acceptable Points in General Cooperative Games”, Annals of Mathematical Studies, I V, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M.R. Farquharson, “Sur une generalisation de la notion d’equilibrium”, Comptes Rendus vol. 240, 1, 1955 pp. 46ff.

    Google Scholar 

  28. N. Howard, “The Theory of Meta-games”, Genera/ Systems, vol. XI, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Duncan Luce, Howard Raiffa, Games and Decisions New York, London 1957, pp. 168 ff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The London School of Economics, UK

    Alfred Zauberman

Authors
  1. Alfred Zauberman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 1980 The Vienna Institute for Comparative Economic Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zauberman, A. (1980). A Differential Game of Intra-CMEA Trade and Pricing.. In: Topics in Trade Coordination of Planned Economies. Vienna Institute for Comparative Economic Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05753-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation