Abstract
There is a mordant irony in the fact that the questions we most need to answer tend often to be the questions we are most reluctant to ask. This is especially true in those areas of human interaction and assessment where the issues are emotively charged and the arguments which express them made manifest primarily in visceral terms. The area comprising mental retardation and its array of social implications is particularly prone to rational abuse, as our understanding of mental retardation is overridden with misconception and myth. In consequence of society’s insistence upon ensuring that the mentally handicapped are sequestered in institutions, the misconception and myth are perpetuated and our attitudes towards the mentally handicapped shaped by ignorance and prejudice. Rhetoric replaces reason, and we find ourselves blinded in respect of the very issues concerning which only our clearest vision will suffice.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes & References
Professor B. Rowan of the University of Miami School of Law, as reported in B. Cochran, ‘Conception, Coercion and Control: Symposium on Reproductive Rights of Mentally Retarded’. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 1974, 25, 5, pp. 283–93; see particularly p. 289.
See J. Glover’s Causing Death and Saving Lives, Penguin, London, 1977, pp. 137.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1980 Ronald S. Laura
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laura, R.S., Gazzard, A. (1980). Do the Mentally Retarded Have a Right to Reproduce. In: Laura, R.S. (eds) Problems of Handicap. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05653-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05653-8_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-29969-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-05653-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)