• Evan Luard


In the last chapter, we considered the main ideas that have been held at different times concerning international economic relationships. In many cases, these ideas have reflected the interests of particular groups, or particular states, in each period. We now need to look in greater detail at the balance of influence within states in each of these periods; and to consider in particular how certain groups have been able to impose their own conception of national interest on the states to which they belonged: in other words, how the collectivisation of interests has been achieved within the international economy.


Free Trade Foreign Trade Wool Cloth British Government Economic Relationship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    R. F. Bently in The Process of Government (Chicago, 1908)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    David Easton in The Governmental Process (New York, 1951).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Unwin, Finance and Trade under Edward III (London, 1918) pp. xxiii, 186–7, 192–4.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Miller, in The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. iv (Cambridge, 1967) p. 327.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Miller, ‘The economic policies of governments’, in The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. III (Cambridge, 1963) p. 289.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. B. Fryde and N. M. Fryde, ‘Public credit with special reference to north western Europe’, in The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. III (Cambridge, 1963) p. 518.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    H. A. Miskinin, The Economy of Early Renaissance Europe, 1300–1460 (Cambridge, 1975) p. 151.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    A. B. Hibbert, ‘The economic policies of towns’, in The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. III (Cambridge, 1963) p. 174.Google Scholar
  9. 16.
    M. Wolf, ‘French views on wealth and taxes from the Middle Ages to the Old Regime’ in D. C. Coleman (ed.), Revisions in Mercantilism (London, 1969) p. 201.Google Scholar
  10. 17.
    C. W. Cole, Colbert and a Century of French Mercantilism, vol. I (New York, 1939) p. 292.Google Scholar
  11. 18.
    C. Davenant, An Essay on East India Trade (London, 1697).Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    Sir J. Child, New Discourse of Trade (London, 1693) ch. 4.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    M. P. Ashley, Financial and Commercial Policy under the Protectorate (London, 1934) ch. XII.Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    C. M. Wilson, Profit and Power (London, 1957) pp. 93, 124.Google Scholar
  15. 24.
    W. E. Minchinton, The Growth of English Overseas Trade, in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century (London, 1969) p. 103.Google Scholar
  16. 25.
    E. F. Heckscher, Mercantilism, vol. II (London, 1935) p. 29.Google Scholar
  17. 26.
    Eric Roll, A History of Economic Thought (London, 1938) pp. 81–2.Google Scholar
  18. 27.
    C. H. Wilson, ‘The other face of mercantilism’, in D. C. Coleman (ed.), Revisions in Mercantilism (London, 1969) pp. 122–5.Google Scholar
  19. 29.
    C. H. Wilson, ‘Trade, society and the state’, in The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. Iv (Cambridge, 1967) p. 572.Google Scholar
  20. 34.
    J. B. Condliffe, The Commerce of Nations (London, 1951) p. 92.Google Scholar
  21. 37.
    J. S. Bromley, The New Cambridge Modern History, vol. vI (Cambridge, 1970) p. 15.Google Scholar
  22. 44.
    P. Ashley, Modern Tariff History (London, 1920) p. 288.Google Scholar
  23. 45.
    B. Semmel, The Rise of Free Trade Imperialism (Cambridge, 1970) p. 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 46.
    J. Morley, The Life of Richard Cobden (London, 1891) p. 366.Google Scholar
  25. 48.
    E. Stanward, American Tariff Controversies in the 19th Century (New York, 1904) quoted in P. Ashley, Modern Tariff History, p. 153.Google Scholar
  26. 51.
    R. L. Schuyler, The Fall of the Old Colonial System (Oxford, 1945) p. 99.Google Scholar
  27. 52.
    D. C. M. Platt, Finance, Trade and Politics in British Foreign Policy, 1815–1914 (Oxford, 1968) p. xxxviii.Google Scholar
  28. 54.
    J. Ehrman, The British Government and Commercial Negotiations with Europe, 1783–1793 (Cambridge, 1962) p. 183.Google Scholar
  29. 55.
    Cf. H. Feis, Europe the World’s Banker, 1870–1914 (New Haven, 1930) pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
  30. 58.
    D. K. Fieldhouse, Economics and Empire 1830–1914 (London, 1973) p. 396. This was part of a well orchestrated lobby and campaign: the Journal des Chambres de Commerce Françaises expressed similar sentiments in an editorial.Google Scholar
  31. 65.
    P. T. Moon, Imperialism and World Politics (New York, 1927) p. 99.Google Scholar
  32. 72.
    N. A. Pelcovits, Old China Hands and the Foreign Office (New York, 1948) for many such cases concerning China. For examples, see D. K. Fieldhouse, op. cit., pp. 184, 237, 322–4, 385–7 and passim.Google Scholar
  33. 78.
    Sir Arthur Salter, World Trade and its Future (Philadelphia, 1936) p. 39.Google Scholar
  34. 79.
    F. Hirsch and P. Oppenheimer, ‘The trial of managed money: currency, credit and prices, 1920–1970’, in The Fontana Economic History of Europe, The Twentieth Century, vol. II (London, 1976) p. 619.Google Scholar
  35. 80.
    A. M. Schlesinger, The Coming of the New Deal (London, 1960) p. 239.Google Scholar
  36. 81.
    W. E. Leuchtenburg, Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, 1932–40 (New York, 1963) p. 22.Google Scholar
  37. 89.
    E. M. Epstein, The Corporation in American Politics (Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1969) pp. 74–8, 90–1, 197–203.Google Scholar
  38. 90.
    R. Vernon, Sovereignty at Bay (London, 1971) p. 228.Google Scholar
  39. 92.
    C. Tugendhat, The Multinationals (London, 1971) p. 129.Google Scholar
  40. 94.
    United Nations, Transnational Corporations in World Development (1978), p. 98.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Evan Luard 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evan Luard

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations