Skip to main content
  • 7 Accesses

Abstract

Large claims have been made for Sterne’s sentimentalism. R. F. Brissenden says that without it, Tristram Shandy would not be a real novel: ‘What transforms Tristram Shandy from an exercise in learned satire or dramatic rhetoric or obscure bawdry is primarily its sentimentalism.’1 John Traugott even goes so far as to claim that sentimentalism is incorporated into Tristram Shandy for its value as a way out of the Shandys’ communicative impasse:

Solipsism and sentimentalism—these are the two faces of Sterne’s coin. This is the way he defines the fall—as solipsism, and the way he redeems the fallen—by sentimentalism.2

Sterne’s sentimentalism is his greatest glory.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. R. F. Brissenden, Virtue in Distress (1974), p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  2. John Traugott, ed. and intro., Laurence Sterne: A Collection of Critical Essays (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1968), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robert Whytt, Observations on those Disorders (1761; 2nd ed. Edinburgh, 1765), pp. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. David Hume, Treatise (1739–40, ed. Lindsay, 1911), Book II, Part i; Volume II, p. 15. 10. David Mercer, Sympathy and Ethics (Oxford, 1972), p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. David Mercer, Sympathy and Ethics (Oxford, 1972), p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Garrick, Occasional Prologue on Quitting the Theatre (1776).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Discours Sur L’Origine et les Fondements de L’Inégalité parmi les Hommes (Amsterdam, 1755), in Great Books of the Western World Vol. XXXVIII, Montesquieu/Rousseau, ed. R. M. Hutchins, trans. G. D. H. Cole as On the Origin of Inequality (Chicago, 1952), pp. 344–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. B. Sheridan, The Rivals, A Comedy (1775), Act II Scene i: Plays, ed. Cecil Price (Oxford, 1973), p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arthur Cash, ‘The Sermon in Tristram ShandyELH, 31 (1964), 395–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. John Milton, Paradise Lost (1667), Book III, 11. 195–8. Poetical Works, ed. D. Bush (1966), p. 261.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joseph Conrad, ‘Henry James: An Appreciation’, North American Review, 180 (1905), 102–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Samuel Johnson, A Dictionary of the English Language (1755), 2 vols. Item on ‘Conscience’, Vol. I.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W.J. Farrell, ‘Nature versus Art as a Comic Principle in Tristram ShandyELH, 30 (1963), 16–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eugène Jolas, ‘My Friend James Joyce’, in James Joyce: Two Decades of Criticism ed. Seon Givens (New York, NY, 1948), rpt. 1963, pp. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1982 Mark Loveridge

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loveridge, M. (1982). Sympathy and Sentiment. In: Laurence Sterne and the Argument about Design. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05600-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics