Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Soviet History and Society ((SSHS))

Abstract

At some point in the summer or autumn of 1931, the debate about the Bolsheviks’ role in the pre-war International came to the attention of Stalin. As a result, he wrote a letter in October to the editors of Proletarskaya revolyutsiya, protesting against the publication, more than a year earlier, of Slutsky’s article. The effect of his letter on historians was cataclysmic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. P. P. Postyshev, ‘Ocherednye zadachi marksistskogo-leniniskogo vospitaniya’, Pravda, 1 September 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See J. P. Nettl, Rosa Luxemburg, vol. 2 (London, 1966), pp. 809–10. In the aftermath of Stalin’s letter, the journal of IKKI contained several references to Luxemburg’s sideas being used by oppositionists; see, for example, Kommunisticheskii internatsional, no. 35, 1931, p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., pp. 101–3. The books in question, Kurs istorii VKP (b), parts III and IV (Moscow, 1930–1), had been criticised for their assertion that the policy of socialism in one country had its origins in the failure of the world revolution to develop. See D. Baevsky, ‘Antipartiinaya vylazka pod flagom istorii partii’, Bolshevik, no. 16, 1931, pp. 90–5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. Knorin, ‘Za bol’shevistskuyu partiinost’ v istoricheskoi nauke’, BK, no. 1, 1932, pp. 23–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Kaganovich, ‘Za bol’shevistskoe izuchenie istorii partii’, TF, no. 14 (December 1931) pp. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Postyshev, ‘Misinterpretations of Stalin’s letter to the “Proletarian Revolution”’, in J. Stalin, L. M. Kaganovich, P. Postyshev, Questions Concerning the History of Bolshevism, A Symposium (Moscow, 1932 ) pp. 35–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1981 John Barber

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barber, J. (1981). Stalin’s Intervention. In: Soviet Historians in Crisis, 1928–1932. Studies in Soviet History and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05239-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05239-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-05241-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-05239-4

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics