The Dynamics of Description

  • Susan R. Horton

Abstract

Anyone who has ever seen David Lean’s wonderful film of Oliver Twist, with its warrens and winding narrow streets through which urchins run like rats in the dark, has to know that no clear and simple Christian rhetoric can dispel that image of a confused and confusing world. There is a rhetoric of description, as critics from Charles Lamb, who talked about the ‘dumb rhetoric of the scenery’, to Robert Garis, who, describing Mrs Jellyby’s house in Bleak House, concluded that ‘every detail is a judgement’ understood.2 Even when we encounter what might appear to be simple, straightforward description of person or place, because of Dickens’s style of reportage, we can be fairly sure that it will begin to shade off immediately into something else: rhetorical admonition to social action or consciousness, or an invitation to escape into a world of fantasy.

Keywords

Burning Furnace Dust Coherence Assure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

The Dynamics of Description

  1. 1.
    Steven Marcus, Dickens: from Pickwick to Dombey (London: Chatto & Windus, 1965) pp. 63–4.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Robert Garis, The Dickens Theatre (London: Oxford University Press, 1965) p. 109.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. A. Richards, Principles of Literary Criticism (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1925) p. 240.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. A. Richards, Practicial Criticism (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1929) p. 210.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    William J. Harvey, Character and the Novel (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1965) p. 37.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Donald Fanger, Dostoevsky and Romantic Realism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967) p. viii.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    William Faulkner, Light in August (New York: Random House, 1950) p. 4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rudolf Arnheim, Visual Thinking (Berkeley: University of Chicago Press, 1971) p. 37.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    George Orwell, ‘Charles Dickens’, in The Collected Essays, ed. Sonia Orwell and Ian Angus (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968) p. 454.Google Scholar
  10. 1.
    Norman N. Holland, The Dynamics of Literary Response (London: Oxford University Press, 1968) p. 146.Google Scholar
  11. 2.
    Henri Bergson, ‘Laughter’, in Comedy, ed. Wylie Sypher (New York: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1956) p. 97.Google Scholar
  12. 3.
    Jonathan Culler, Structuralist Poetics (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1975) p. 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 5.
    Simon O. Lesser, Fiction and the Unconscious (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957) pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
  14. 6.
    Otto Fenichel, The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1945) p. 373.Google Scholar
  15. 7.
    Bernard Schilling, in The Comic Spirit: Boccaccio to Thomas Mann (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1965) p. 108, recognises this fact too, when he says that Micawber ‘finds the cure and relief of suffering in its expression’.Google Scholar
  16. 9.
    Bruce F. Kawin, Telling it Again and Again: Repetition in Literature and Film (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1972) p. 4.Google Scholar
  17. 10.
    F. R. and Q. D. Leavis, Dickens the Novelist (New York: Random House, 1970) p. 311.Google Scholar
  18. Leo Marx, The Machine in the Garden (New York and London: Oxford University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
  19. 15.
    See Mary McCarthy, ‘Recalled to Life, or Charles Dickens at the Bar’, in On the Contrary (New York: Farrar, Straus & Cudahy, 1946) for a discussion of the Victorian love of extremes, the ‘passion for mountain-climbing, for gorges and precipices, for the abysmal vertigo of crime and innocence, horror and bathos’.Google Scholar
  20. 17.
    Alexander Welsh, The City of Dickens (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971) p. 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 18.
    Steven Marcus, ‘Human Nature, Social Orders, and 19th Century Systems of Explanation: Starting in with George Eliot’, in Salmagundi, No. 28 (Winter 1975) p. 22.Google Scholar
  22. 19.
    Pearl Chester Solomon, Dickens and Melville in their Time (New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1975) p. 3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Susan R. Horton 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan R. Horton
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MassachusettsUSA

Personalised recommendations