Agricultural Extension: Myth, Reality and Challenge

  • Robert Chambers
  • B. W. E. Wickremanayake
Part of the English Language Book Society student editions book series (ELBSSE)

Abstract

Agricultural extension has generated a large literature for India (including the Journal of Extension Education; Roy et al., 1968; Fliegel et al., 1968; Hunter, 1970; Sinha (ed.), 1972; Heginbotham, 1973; Mook, 1974), and has also been studied in some of its aspects in Sri Lanka (Abeyratne, 1973; ARTI, 1974). Much of the concern has been with the diffusion of new technology in agriculture, with a tendency in India towards studies of the communication process. Our own selective study was concerned with comparing agricultural extension in North Arcot and SE. Sri Lanka; with considering to what extent, if any, the different levels of adoption of the new technology could be attributed to differences in extension; and with policy prescriptions that might flow from our research experience.

Keywords

Urea Income Preconceive 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abeyratne, E. F. L. (1973). The Extension of High Yielding Varieties, paper to ARTI/IDS Seminar on the Social and Economic Consequences of the New Seeds, Colombo, mimeo.Google Scholar
  2. ARTI, (1974). The Agrarian Situation Relating to Paddy Cultivation in Five Selected Districts of Sri Lanka Part 1: Hambantota District, Research Study Series no. 6, Agrarian Research and Training Institute, Colombo.Google Scholar
  3. Chakravarty, T. K. and Arya, H. P. S. (1974). ‘Village-Level Workers and Their Work: an Analysis of Job Structure in Different Contexts’, Behavioural Science and Community Development, 8, 53–63.Google Scholar
  4. Chambers, Robert and Belshaw, Deryke (1973). Managing Rural Development: Lessons and Methods from Eastern Africa, Discussion Paper no. 15, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  5. Chambers, Robert (1974). Managing Rural Development: Ideas and Experience from East Africa, Uppsala, Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.Google Scholar
  6. Chockalingam, K. (1972). Census of India 1971, Ser. 19, Tamil Nadu Part X—B District Census Handbook, Village and Town-wise Primary Census Abstract, North Arcot vol. 1, Madras.Google Scholar
  7. Dandekar, V. M. (1967). Presidential Address to the Ind. Soc. Agric. Econ., Ind. J. Agric. Econ., 22.Google Scholar
  8. Fliegel, F. C., Roy, P., Sen, L. K. and Kivlin, J. E. (1968). Agricultural Innovations in Indian Villages, Hyderabad, National Institute of Community Development.Google Scholar
  9. Heginbotham, Stanley J. (1973). ‘The Dynamics of Post-Colonial Bureaucracy: Culture, History and Ideology in Indian Administration’, typescript, S. Asian Inst., New York, Columbia University (to be published as a book by Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  10. Hunter, G. (1970). The Administration of Agricultural Development: Lessons from India, London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Mook, B. (1974). Value and Action in Indian Bureaucracy, Discussion Paper no. 65, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  12. Roy, P., Fliegel, F. C., Kivlin, J. E. and Sen, L. K. (1968). Agricultural Innovation among Indian Farmers, Hyderabad, National Institute of Community Development.Google Scholar
  13. Sinha, P. R. R. (ed.) (1972). Studies in Extension Education, Hyderabad, National Institute of Community Development.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© B. H. Farmer 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Chambers
  • B. W. E. Wickremanayake

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations