Advertisement

Voice Identification by Man and Machine: a Review of Research

  • Ray Bull
Part of the Oxford Socio-Legal Studies book series (OSLS)

Abstract

Most criminal identifications are made using visual cues, but there are some instances when both visual and verbal information is available, and others when only verbal cues exist. In obscene telephone calls, for example, often the only possible method of identifying the speaker is by his voice. Similarly, in kidnap cases information concerning the kidnapper’s voice is sometimes made available by him over the telephone. In such situations, when a suspect is in the hands of the police a voice-matching exercise may be undertaken. Here a witness may be asked whether the suspect’s voice resembles the criminal’s voice, or a machine may be employed in an attempt to answer these questions if a record (e.g. a tape) of the original criminal voice is available. In the Psychology Department of the North East London Polytechnic, Brian Clifford and I have recently begun a programme of research (funded by the Home Office) concerning the voice identification performance of human listeners in this kind of context.

Keywords

Acoustical Society Speaker Recognition Speech Sample Voice Recognition Legal Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Block, Voiceprinting (New York: McKay, 1975).Google Scholar
  2. R. Bolt, F. Cooper, E. David, P. Denes, J. Pickett and K. Stevens, ‘Speaker identification by speech spectrograms: A scientist’s view of its reliability for legal purposes’, journal of the Acoustical Soceity of America, 47 (1969) 597–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Bricker and S. Pruzansky, ‘Effects of stimulus content and duration on talker identification’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 40 (1966) 1441–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Bull, ‘The influence of stereotypes on person identification’, in D. P. Farrington, K. Hawkins and S. M. Lloyd-Bostock (eds.), Psychology, Law and Legal Processes (London: Macmillan, 1979).Google Scholar
  5. R. Bull and B. Clifford, ‘Identification: the Devlin Report’, New Scientist, 70 (1976) 307–8.Google Scholar
  6. B. Clifford and R. Bull, The Psychology of Person Identification (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978).Google Scholar
  7. P. Cutler, C.Thigpen, T. Young and E. Mueller, ‘The evidentiary value of spectrographic voice identification’, Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 63 (1972) 343–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. P. Denes, ‘Speech recognition: old and new ideas’, in D. Reddy (ed.), Speech Recognition (New York and London: Academic Press, 1974).Google Scholar
  9. Devlin Report, Report to the Secretary of State for the Home Department of the Departmental Committee on Evidence of Identification in Criminal Cases (London: HMSO, 1976).Google Scholar
  10. J. Edwards, ‘The status of voiceprints as admissible evidence’, Syracuse Law Review, 24 (1973) 1261–78.Google Scholar
  11. H. Greene, ‘Voiceprint identification: the case in favour of admissibility’, American Criminal Law Review, 13 (1975) 171–200.Google Scholar
  12. M. Hall, ‘The current status of speaker identification by use of speech spectrograms’, Canadian Journal of Forensic Science, 7 (1974) 152–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. W. Hargreaves and J. Starkweather, ‘Recognition of speaker identity’, Language and Speech, 6 (1963) 63–7.Google Scholar
  14. M. Hecker, ‘Speaker recognition’, American Speech and Hearing Association monograph no. 16 (1971).Google Scholar
  15. J. Hennessy and C. Romig, ‘A review of the experiments involving voiceprint identification’, Journal of Forensic Science, 16 (1971) 183–98.Google Scholar
  16. H. Hollein and R. McGlone, ‘An evaluation of the voiceprint technique of speaker identification’, Proceedings of the Garnahan Crime Countermeasures Conference (1976) 39–45.Google Scholar
  17. L. Kersta, ‘Voiceprint identification’, Nature, 196 (1962) 1253–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. E. Kramer, ‘Judgement of personal characteristics and emotions from nonverbal properties of speech’, Psychological Bulletin, 6 (1963) 408–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. P. Ladgefoged and R. Vanderslice, ‘The voiceprint mystique’, Working Papers in Phonetics, 7 (1967) University of California.Google Scholar
  20. D. Lykken, ‘Psychology and the lie detector industry’, American Psychologist, 29 (1974) 725–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. F. McGehee, ‘The reliability of the identification of the human voice’, Journal of General Psychology, 17 (1937) 249–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. T. Martin, ‘Application of limited vocabulary recognition systems’, in D. Reddy (ed.), Speech Recognition (New York and London: Academic Press, 1974).Google Scholar
  23. T. Murray and S. Cort, ‘Aural identification of children’s voices’, Journal of Auditory Research, 11 (1971) 260–2.Google Scholar
  24. I. Pollack, J. Pickett and W. Sumby, ‘On the identification of speakers by voice’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26 (1954) 403–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. K. Scherer, ‘Voice quality analysis of American and German speakers’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3 (1974) 281–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. K. Stevens, C. Williams, J. Carbonnel and B. Woods, ‘Speaker authentication and identification: A Comparison of spectrographic and auditory presentation of speech material’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44 (1968). 1596–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O. Tosi, W. Oyer, C. Lashbrook, J. Pedrey and E. Nash, ‘Experiment on voice identification’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51 (1972) 2030–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. J. Wolff, ‘Efficient acoustic parameters for speaker recognition’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51 (1972) 2044–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. M. Young and R. Campbell, ‘Effects of content on talker identification’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 42 (1967) 1250–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ray Bull 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ray Bull

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations