Skip to main content

Scientific Method and Wells’s Credentials

  • Chapter

Abstract

While no reader can fail to have been struck by the emphasis on science in Wells’s work, there has been no universal agreement amongst critics as to whether Wells’s thought was consistent with, or influenced by, scientific method. The most interesting point to emerge from a survey of the critical estimates is that while those scientists who are familiar with Wells’s work have for the most part applauded his treatment of scientific interests, even, in a few cases, regarding it as germinal to their own ideas, literary critics, after the first wave of somewhat indiscriminate enthusiasm, have tended to denigrate Wells’s scientific ability and to dismiss his work as, at best, interesting fantasy. Such a strange division of opinion would be worth examining in its own right, but it is especially interesting here for the light it throws on the popular misconceptions of science which Wells was concerned to erase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. E. R. Lankester, ‘The present judged by the future’, Nature, LXV. Supplement (13 Mar. 1902), iv-v.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold Bennett, ‘Herbert George Wells and his work’, Cosmopolitan Magazine, XXXIII (Aug. 1902), 466.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Silberstein, The Theory of Relativity (London, 1914), p. 134.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Szilard, ‘Reminiscences’, Perspectives in American History (Cambridge, Mass., 1968), II, p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. S. Huxley, ‘H. G. Wells’, The Spectator CLXXVII (16 Aug. 1946), 161.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. West, ‘H. G. Wells’, Encounter, VIII, No. 2 (Feb. 1957), 53.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Bergonzi, The Early H. G. Wells (Manchester, 1961), p. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Heisenberg, Physics and Philosophy (New York, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Jeans, The New Background of Science (Michigan, 1959), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. B. Pitkin, ‘Time and pure activity’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Method, XI (1914), 524.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. B. Burke, ‘Mr Wells and modern science’, Dublin Review, CLXIX (Oct. 1921), 233.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Chalmers Mitchell, ‘Mr Wells’s Dr Moreau’, Saturday Review, LXXXI (11 Apr. 1896), 368.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1980 R. D. Haynes

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haynes, R.D. (1980). Scientific Method and Wells’s Credentials. In: H. G. Wells: Discoverer of the Future. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04868-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics