Disability pp 159-172 | Cite as

Rehabilitation Ambulatory Monitoring

  • J. Macgregor
Part of the Strathclyde Bioengineering Seminars book series (KESE)

Summary

Limited mobility is an important aspect of physical handicap and much clinical prosthetic and orthotic effort is expended in improving patients’ ambulatory performance. A system of monitoring is described which provides a permanent record of life-style’ in terms of activity and effort expenditure over 24-hour periods. Precise information is obtained on distance travelled, frequency distribution of steps with cadence, etc. Of particular value is a derived measure of ‘physiological cost’ of each element of activity based on interval analysis of ECG waveforms throughout the day and related to distance travelled. The system enables the clinical team to consider an objective measure of physical handicap pertinent to the home environment and to observe variations in performance as a result of modification to prosthetic or orthotic prescription.

Keywords

Anisotropy Harness AgCl Poliomyelitis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Astrand, P. O. and Rodahl, K. (1970). Textbook of Work Physiology, McGraw Hill Kagakuska Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  2. Dyson, R. J. (1977). The Physiological Cost of Amputee Locomotion. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  3. Ganguli, S., Bose, K. S. and Data, S. R. (1976). A new method for energy evaluation in rehabilitation clinics. I.S.P.O. Bull., 20, 4–5.Google Scholar
  4. Hamilton, D. (1975). Evaluation of computer-assisted system for determination of heart rate variability measures from recorded electrocardiograms. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  5. Karagozoglu, B. (1977). A system of assessment of physiological cost of daily activities of unencumbered patients. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  6. McKinnon, J. B. (1974). Miniature 4 channel cassette recorder for physiological and other variables. Biotelemetry, Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium,Paris, pp. 67–70.Google Scholar
  7. Molen, N. H. (1973). Problems on the evaluation of gait with special reference to the comparison of normal subjects with BK amputees. Ph.D. Thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  8. Stallard, J., Rose, G. K., Tait, J. A. and Davis J. B. (1978). Assessment of orthoses by means of speed and heart rate. J. med. eng. Tech., 22–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bioengineering Unit, University of Strathclyde 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Macgregor

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations