Advertisement

An Experimental Case Study of the Successes and Failures of Job Enrichment in a Government Agency

Chapter
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

An experimental job enrichment programme was introduced in three clerical work units of a federal agency. Matched control groups were selected for each experimental unit. The programme was introduced after careful diagnosis of the work situation and thorough training of the personnel involved. Within the limits imposed by the field situation, before—after measures of both behaviour and attitudes suggested that changes in behaviour (e.g. productivity, absences) occurred in favour of the experimental groups. Job enrichment apparently had no effect on attitudes, however. On the basis of interviews and observations, the productivity changes were attributed mainly to more efficient use of manpower, elimination of unnecessary operations, and feedback and competition, while the absence changes were attributed to initial changes in morale based on the expectation of extrinsic rewards. It was concluded that attitudes did not improve because the expectation and desire for such rewards had not been, met. The problems and limitations of job enrichment are discussed.

Keywords

Work Unit Disciplinary Action Absence Rate Extrinsic Reward Rigid Rule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ford R. N., Motivation through the Work Itself, (New York: American Management Association, 1969a).Google Scholar
  2. Ford R. N., ‘The Obstinate Employee’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 33 (1969b) 301–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hackman J. R., ‘On the Coming Demise of Job Enrichment’, in Cass L. and Zimmer F. G. (eds), Man and Work in Society, (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1975).Google Scholar
  4. Harris T. C. and Locke E. A., ‘Replication of White-Collar — Blue-Collar Differences in Sources of Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (1974) 369–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Herzberg F., Work and the Nature of Man, (New York: World, 1966).Google Scholar
  6. Herzberg F., Mausner B. and Snyderman B., The Motivation to Work, (New York: Wiley, 1959).Google Scholar
  7. Hulin C. L., ‘Individual Differences in Job Enrichment — The Case against General Treatments’, in Maher J. R. (ed.), New Perspectives in Job Enrichment, (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1971).Google Scholar
  8. Lawler E. E., ‘Job Design and Employee Motivation’, in Vroom V. and Deci E. (eds), Management and Motivation, (Baltimore, Md.: Penguin, 1970).Google Scholar
  9. Levitan A. A. and Johnston W. B., Work is Here to Stay, Alas, (Salt Lake City, Utah: Olympus, 1973).Google Scholar
  10. Locke E. A., ‘Satisfiers and Dissatisfiers among White-Collar and Blue-Collar Employees’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 58 (1973) 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Locke E. A., ‘An Experimental Study of Job Enrichment’ (Final Report, Contract CS-1423) (Washington, D.C.: Civil Service Commission). Unpublished report, 1974.Google Scholar
  12. Locke E. A., ‘Personnel Attitudes and Motivation’, Annual Review of Psychology, 26 (1975) 457–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Locke, E. A., ‘The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction’, in Dunnette M. D. (ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, (Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1976).Google Scholar
  14. Maher J. R., ‘Enriching Low-Skill Jobs. I’, in Maher J. R. (ed.), New Perspectives in J ob Enrichment, (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1971a).Google Scholar
  15. Maher J. R., New Perspectives in Job Enrichment, (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1971b).Google Scholar
  16. Paul W. J., Robertson K. B. and Herzberg F., ‘Job Enrichment Pays Off’, Harvard Business Review, 47(2) (1969) 61–77.Google Scholar
  17. Schneider J. and Locke E. A., ‘A Critique of Herzberg’s Incident Classification System and a Suggested Revision’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6 (1971) 441–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sirota D., ‘Job Enrichment — Another Management Fad?’, Conference Board Record, 10 (1973) 40–5.Google Scholar
  19. Sirota D. and Wolfson A., ‘Job Enrichment: Surmounting the Obstacles’, Personnel, July/August (1972a) 8–19.Google Scholar
  20. Sirota D. and Wolfson A., ‘Job Enrichment: What are the Obstacles?’, Personnel, May/June (1972) 8–17.Google Scholar
  21. Sirota D. and Wolfson A., ‘Pragmatic Approach to People Problems’, Harvard Business Review, 51(1) (1973) 120–8.Google Scholar
  22. Taylor F. W., The Principles of Scientific Management, (New York: Norton, 1967).Google Scholar
  23. United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Work in America, (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972).Google Scholar
  24. Von Mises L., Bureaucracy, (New Rochelle, N.Y.: Arlington House, 1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1981

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations