Knowledge of Performance as an Incentive in Repetitive Industrial Work

  • P. S. Hundal

Abstract

This study was designed to assess the purely motivational effects of knowledge of performance in a repetitive industrial task. The Ss were low paid workers with a few years (1–5 yr) experience on the job. The experimental task was to grind a metallic piece to a specified size and shape. Experimental conditions were imposed a week before starting the experiment. The workers adjusted readily since the experimental conditions did not interfere with the work. Eighteen male workers were divided randomly into three groups. The Ss in Group A received no information about their output; Ss in Group B were allowed a rough estimate of their output; Ss in Group C were given accurate information about their output and could check it further by referring to a figure displayed before them. Results show increased output with increases in degree of knowledge of performance.

Keywords

Income 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ammons R. S., ‘Knowledge of Performance: Survey of Literature, some Possible Applications and Suggested Examination’, Technical Report No. 54–14 (Washington, D.C.: United States Air Force, 1954).Google Scholar
  2. Chapanis A., ‘Knowledge of Performance as an Incentive in Repetitive Monotonous Tasks’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 48 (1964) 263–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gibbs C. B. and Brown I. D., ‘Increased Production from the Information Incentive in a Repetitive Task’, Technical Report No. 230 (Great Britain: Medical Research Council, Applied Psychological Research Unit, 1955).Google Scholar
  4. Locke E. A. and Bryan J. F., ‘Cognitive Aspects of Psychomotor Performance: The Effects of Performance Goals on Level of Performance’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 50 (1966) 286–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Locke E. A. and Bryan J. F., ‘Performance Goals as Determinants of Level of Performance and Boredom’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 51 (1967) 120–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Siegel S., Nonparametric Statistics, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. S. Hundal
    • 1
  1. 1.Punjab UniversityChandigarh-14India

Personalised recommendations