Skip to main content

The Exercise of Command

  • Chapter
  • 16 Accesses

Abstract

The ability to mount or defeat operations against the shore is one of the two main ways in which command is exercised and the sea used. This form of sea use suffers from the absence of a consistent vocabulary in maritime strategy. Competing words and definitions jostle with each other to attract support: amphibious warfare, combined operations, land-sea operations, the projection of power ashore, overseas raids and invasions, attacks on territory from the sea. These all have strengths and weaknesses, but none have won universal acclaim. Probably in this case, though, the consequence is not so bad as it is with ‘sea power’ or ‘the command of the sea’. Even though the name is in dispute, there is broad agreement about what it stands for. Like Shakespeare’s rose, it smells the same, more or less, whatever we call it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Gorshkov (1979) p. 214; Brodie (1965) p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kennedy (1976) p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Richmond (1934) p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gorshkov (1979) p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quoted by Rear Adm. T. By am Martin in dispatch to Lord Keith, 21 Sep. 1813. Naval Records Society, vol. XII, p. 409.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corbett (1918) p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corbett vol. I (1907) pp. 207–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid. p. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quoted in Brodie (1965) p. 155–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Quoted in Richmond (1946) pp. 338–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brodie (1965) p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Richmond (1946) p. 340.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quoted in ibid. p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Corbett vol. I (1907) pp. 269–70.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roskill (1954) p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grenfell (1937) pp. 28–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Corbett (1918) p. 269.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Richmond (1941b).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Corbett vol. I (1907) pp. 218–19.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mahan (1911) pp. 200, 205.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Richmond (1941b).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brodie (1965) p. 157.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ruge (1979) p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nimitz (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Chapter 2, Section c.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Quoted in Marder (1940) p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Quoted in Grenfell (1937) p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Quoted in Custance (1907) p. 302.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Quoted in Woodward (1965) pp. 206–7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Quoted in Bridge (1910) p. 269.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mahan (1911) pp. 151, 293.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Corbett vol. I (1907) pp. 93–4.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Corbett (1918) p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Quoted in Richmond (1930) p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid. p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  36. MccGwire (1976) p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Corbett (1918) p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jane (1906) p. 145; Hipper quoted in Philbin (1977) p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Symcox (1974) pp. 221–33; Richmond (1953) pp. 352–3.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Corbett (1898) pp. 129, 335; Mahan (1890) pp. 132–3; Castex vol. IV (1939) pp. 113–14, 285–344; Gorshkov (1979) p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  41. de Lanessan (1903).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mahan (1890) p. 539; Corbett vol. II (1907) pp. 375–6.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mahan (1890) p. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mahan vol. II (1892) p. 184.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Richmond (1930) p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Corbett (1918) p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Acworth (1930) p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Grenfell (1937) p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Corbett (1918) p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  50. de Lanessan (1903).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Westcott (1919) pp. 16, 18; but see also Mahan (1911) p. 355–6.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Respectively, Waters (1957) pp. 7–8; Schurman (1965) pp. 135–7; Grenfell (1937) p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Richmond, evidence to Bonar Law Enquiry, 5 Jan. 1921, Cab. 16/37, Public Record Office, London; Rosinski (1977) p. 13; also Castex vol. I (1929) p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jane (1906) p. 174.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Colomb quoted in Waters (1957) p. 57; Richmond (1953) p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Gretton (1965) p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bridge (1907) p. 123; Sir John Fisher, quoted in Marder (1940) p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Roskill (1954) pp. 10ff; (1962) pp. 158, 179.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Gretton (1965) p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mahan (1890) p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Waters (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Quoted in Mahan (1899) p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Corbett (1918) p. 245.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Roskill vol. III, Pt. I (1954) p. 348.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Quoted in Waters (1957) p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Grenfell (1937) p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mahan vol. II (1892) p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Richmond (1930) p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1982 Geoffrey Till

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Till, G. (1982). The Exercise of Command. In: Maritime Strategy and the Nuclear Age. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04500-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics