Advertisement

Potential Sources of Opposition in the East European Peasantry

  • Paul G. Lewis
Part of the St Antony’s book series

Abstract

The resistance that the peasants of Eastern Europe offered to the establishment of communist power was centred on the conflict stemming from the peasants’ dekire to retain an independent form of agriculture in contrast to the communist leaders’ determination (more pronounced in some cases than in others) to achieve the social transformation of the countryside in a collectivist direction. It is now a decade and a half since this collectivisation process was largely brought to a close. This transformation of the social features of the East European countryside, commencing in 1949, lasted some thirteen years and turned out to be a smoother and more thoroughgoing process in some countries than in others. The pace of collectivisation slowed markedly following Stalin’s death and in some countries a number of collective farms were dissolved. A second phase of collectivisation was launched between 1957 and 1959 and the establishment of collective agriculture in most countries of Eastern Europe was more or less complete by 1962. In Yugoslavia and Poland a second phase of collectivisation never was launched and agriculture there has largely remained in the hands of independent farmers since the fifties. The trauma of collectivisation thus lies even further back in those countries.

Keywords

Communist Regime East European Country Political Opposition Peasant Farmer Agricultural Population 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    R. C. Gripp; The Political System of Communism ( London: Nelson, 1973 ), p. 88.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    V. V. Kusin, Political Grouping in the Czechoslovak Reform Movement ( London: Macmillan, 1972 ), p. 54.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    S. Fischer-Galati, Twentieth Century Rumania (New York: Columbia University Press, 1970), p. 213.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    H. G. Skilling, Czechoslovakia’s Interrupted Revolution ( Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1976 ), p. 586.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    A. E. Adams and J. S. Adams, Men versus Systems: Agriculture in the USSR, Poland and Czechoslovakia ( New York: Free Press, 1971 ), pp. 189–91.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    Cf B. D. Denitch, The Legitimation of a Revolution: the Yugoslav Case ( New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976 ), pp. 68–9.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    P. Green ‘The third round in Poland’, New Left Review, no. 101–2 (April, 1977), pp. 78, 96.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    E. Ciupak ‘The changing face of rural Catholicism’, Polish Perspectives, vol. XIII (March 1975), p. 31.Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    Z. Salzmann and V. Scheufler, Komarov: a Czech Farming Village ( New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1974 ), p. 120.Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    E. Fel and R. Hofer, Proper Peasants ( Chicago: Aldine, 1969 ), p. 384.Google Scholar
  11. 16.
    I. Winner, A Slovenian Village: Zerovnica ( Providence, R.I.: Brown University Press, 1971 ), p. 197.Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    S. K. Pavlowitch, Yugoslavia ( London: Ernest Benn, 1971 ), p. 348.Google Scholar
  13. 19.
    N. Pano, The Albanian cultural revolution’, Problems of Communism, vol. xxoi, no. 4 (July-August 1974 ), p. 49.Google Scholar
  14. 23.
    J. Halpern, ‘Farming as a way of life: Yugoslav peasant attitudes’, in J. Karcz, ed., Soviet and East European Agriculture ( Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1967 ), p. 381.Google Scholar
  15. 27.
    W. G. Lockwood, ‘The peasant-worker in Yugoslavia’, in B. L. Faber, ed., The Social Structure of Eastern Europe ( New York: Praeger, 1976 ), p. 284.Google Scholar
  16. 28.
    P. Toma and I. Volgyes, Politics in Hungary ( San Francisco, Calif.: W. H. Freeman, 1977 ), p. 131.Google Scholar
  17. 29.
    G. Konrad and I. Szelényi, ‘Social conflicts of underurbanization: the Hungarian case’, in M. Field, ed., Social Consequences of Modernization in Communist Societies ( Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976 ), p. 166.Google Scholar
  18. 31.
    A. Matejko, Social Change and Stratification in Eastern Europe ( New York: Praeger, 1974 ), p. 75.Google Scholar
  19. 37.
    A. Olszewska, Wies uprzemysiowiona (Warsaw, 1969), pp. 142–3.Google Scholar
  20. 42.
    K-E Wädekin, ‘The place of agriculture in the European communist economies: a statistical essay’, Soviet Studies, vol. xamc (August, 1977), p. 249.Google Scholar
  21. 43.
    B. Racz, ‘Political changes in Hungary after the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia’, Slavic Review, vol. xamc, (December, 1970), p. 645.Google Scholar
  22. 44.
    B. Mieczkowski, Personal and Social Consumption in Eastern Europe ( New York: Praeger, 1975 ), p. 41.Google Scholar
  23. 46.
    K. Sontheimer and W. Bleek, The Government and Politics of East Germany ( London: Hutchinson, 1975 ), p. 162.Google Scholar
  24. 47.
    T. Bergmann, Farm Policies in Socialist Countries ( Westmead: Saxon House, 1975 ), p. 97.Google Scholar
  25. 49.
    F. Donath, ‘Economic growth and socialist agriculture’, New Hungarian Quarterly 66 (Summer 1977), pp. 121–2.Google Scholar
  26. 53.
    F. Singleton, Twentieth Century Yugoslavia ( London: Macmillan, 1976 ), p. 224.Google Scholar
  27. 55.
    D. Dyker, ‘Yugoslavia: unity of diversity?’, in A. Brown and J. Gray, eds., Political Culture and Political Change in Communist States ( London: Macmillan, 1977 ), p. 68.Google Scholar
  28. 56.
    P. Shoup, ‘The national question in Yugoslavia’, Problems of Communism, vol. XXI (January-February, 1972), p. 24.Google Scholar
  29. 57.
    N. Lang, The dialectics of decentralisation: economic reform and regional inequality in Yugoslavia’, World Politics, vol. XXVIII (April 1975), p. 328.Google Scholar
  30. 58.
    J. Tepicht, ‘A project for research on the peasant revolution of our time’, Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. II, ( April 1975 ), p. 263.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Paul G. Lewis 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul G. Lewis

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations