The Basis of Choice and Preference

  • R. W. Vickerman

Abstract

The cornerstone of all microeconomics, indeed of all questions with an economic content, is choice. To many economists the rigorous development of a theory of choice has been seen as less important than the important results concerning resource allocation which can be derived from it. Possibly this has been because of the need for practical application of the results of theoretical exercises, but the hiding of an explicit choice theory behind the concepts of utility and indifference has often served to confuse and hinder the acceptance and application of the tools of economics to many problems. Yet ultimately economics is not about as abstract an idea as resource allocation, it is about choice, choice of the individual as to what to do, where to go, what to buy, choice of the producer as to what and where to produce and how, choice of the community how to live and so on.

Keywords

Income Clarification Baumol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baumol, W. J. (1977), Economic Theory and Operations Analysis, 4th ed. (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S. (1965), ‘A theory of the allocation of time’, Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1976), The Economic Approach to Human Behaviour (Chicago: Chicago U.P.).Google Scholar
  4. Cicchetti, C. J., and Smith, V. K. (1976), The Costs of Congestion: An Econometric Analysis of Wilderness Recreation (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger).Google Scholar
  5. de Donnea, F. X. (1972), ‘Consumer behaviour, transport mode choice and the value of time: some microeconomic models’, Regional and Urban Economics, 1, 355–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeSerpa, A. C. (1971), ‘A theory of the economics of time’, Economic Journal, 81, 828–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeSerpa, A. C. (1973), ‘Microeconomic theory and the valuation of travel time: some clarification’, Regional and Urban Economics, 2, 401–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, W., and Tversky, A. (eds) (1967), Decision Making (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
  9. Evans, A. W. (1972), ‘On the theory of the valuation and allocation of time’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 19, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gorman, W. M. (1959), ‘Separable utility and aggregation’, Econometrica, 27, 469–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green, H. A. J. (1976), Consumer Theory, rev. ed. (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  12. Gronau, R. (1977), ‘Leisure, home production and work—the theory of the allocation of time revisited’, Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1099–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Isard, W. (1956), Location and Space Economy (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press).Google Scholar
  14. Isard, W. (1975), Introduction to Regional Science (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  15. Lancaster, K. J. (1966), ‘A new approach to consumer theory’, Journal of Political Economy, 174, 132–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peston, M. (1972), Public Goods and the Public Sector (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Quandt, R. E., and Baumol, W. J. (1966), ‘The demand for abstract modes’, Journal of Regional Science, 6, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Simmons, P. J. (1974), Choice and Demand (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  19. Strotz, R. (1957), ‘The empirical implications of a utility tree’, Econometrica, 25, 269–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Strotz, R. (1959), ‘The utility tree: a correction and further appraisal’, Econometrica, 27, 482–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© R. W. Vickerman 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. W. Vickerman
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations