Abstract
Americans were accustomed to viewing international politics, which up to 1940 was to all intents and purposes European politics, with a certain detachment. The European propensity to war was symptomatic of its dominance by reactionary and decadent élites and the persistence of imperialist instincts. Furthermore, there was little reason to view war as a grim struggle for survival, let alone a time for defiant resistance. The United States’ industrial and economic resources were so vast that there were few doubts that, once she put her mind to the task, any enemy would be eventually overwhelmed. The United States was the weary policeman, slow to be roused and loath to get involved in the internecine quarrels of European states. Once aware of danger and into action, she was unbeatable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Walter Lippmann, ‘Why we are disarming ourselves?’, Redbrook Magazine (September 1946), p. 106.
Bernard Brodie, ‘The atom bomb as policy-make’, Foreign Affairs, XXVII: 1 (October 1948), p. 21.
William Fox, The Superpowers: The United States, Britain and the Soviet Union and Their Responsibility for Peace (New York: Harcourt & Brace, 1944), p. 102.
Walter Millis (ed.), The Forrestal Diaries (London: Cassell & Co. 1952), p. 45.
Air Staff, Strategic Implications of the Atomic Bomb on Warfare (3 February 1947). See Klotz, op. cit.
Joint Chiefs of Staff, Evaluation of Current Strategic Air Offensive Plans (21 December 1948), in Etzold and Gaddis, op. cit. pp.357–60.
H. S. Dinerstein, War and the Soviet Union (New York: Praeger, 1959), p. 32.
In 1949, cited in Raymond L. Garthoff, Soviet Military Doctrine (Illinois: The Free Press, 1953), p. 174.
Colonel-General of Aviation Nikitin, cited in Raymond L. Garthoff, Soviet Strategy in the Nuclear Age (New York: Praeger, 1958), pp. 173–4.
Copyright information
© 1983 The International Institute for Strategic Studies
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Freedman, L. (1983). Strategy for an Atomic Monopoly. In: The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04271-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04271-5_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-04273-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-04271-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)