Skip to main content

Common Sense Morality and Accident Compensation

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Oxford Socio-Legal Studies ((OSLS))

Abstract

Accident victims in this country receive compensation and support from a multitude of sources with widely varying criteria of entitlement. One of the oldest among these is the tort system of compensation for personal injury. The law takes the position that losses arising from accidents rest where they fall — that is, on the victim — unless there are good grounds for shifting them, and fault is regarded as providing such grounds. Atiyah (1975) expresses this ‘fault principle’ as follows:

First, that it is just that a person who causes loss or damage whether to himself or another, should bear the burden of that loss or damage to the extent that it was caused by his fault. Second, that it is just that a person who causes loss or damage to another without fault should not be required to compensate that other (p. 415).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • P. S. Atiyah, Accidents, Compensation and the Law, 2nd ed. (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. E. Berg and P. Mussen, ‘The origins and development of concepts of justice’. Journal of Social Issues, XXXI, 3 (1975) 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Berkowitz, ‘Social norms, feelings and other factors affecting helping and altruism’, in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. VI (New York: Academic Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. B. Burman, H. G. Genn and J. Lyons, ‘Pilot study of the use of legal services by victims of accidents in the home’, Modern Law Review, XL (1977) 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Calabresi, The Costs of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis, (New Haven, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Deutsch, ‘Equity, equality, and need: what determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?’, Journal of Social Issues, XXVI, 3 (1975) 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Ehrenzweig, ‘A psychoanalysis of negligence’, Northwestern University Law Review, XL (1953) 855.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Kohlberg, ‘Stage and sequence: the cognitive developmental approach to socialisation’ in D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of Socialisation Theory and Research (Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Lerner, ‘The justice motive: some hypotheses as to its origins and forms’. Journal of Personality, XLV (1977) 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. M. Linden, Canadian Negligence Law, 2nd ed. (Toronto: Butterworth, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. M. Lloyd-Bostock, ‘The ordinary man and the psychology of attributing causes and responsibility’, Modern Law Review (In press 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson Commission: Report of the Royal Commission on Civil Liability and Compensation for Personal Injury (Chairman: Lord Pearson), Cmnd. 7054–1 (London: HMSO, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Phillips and K. Hawkins, ‘Some economic aspects of the settlement process: a study of personal injury claims’, Modern Law Review, XXXIX, 4 (1976) 477–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. L. Ross, Settled out of Court: The Social Process of Insurance Claims Adjustment (Chicago: Aldine, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. E. Sampson, ‘On justice as equality’, Journal of Social Issues, XXXI, 3 (1975) 4561

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Schwartz, ‘The justice of need and the activation of humanitarian norms’, Journal of Social Issues, XXXI, 3 (1975) 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Walster, E. Berscheid and G. W. Walster, ‘New directions in equity research’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25 (1973) 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Walster and G. W. Walster, ‘Equity and social justice’, Journal of Social Issues, XXXI, 3 (1975) 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Williams and B. A. Hepple, Foundations of the Law of Tort (London: Butterworth, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1979 Social Science Research Council

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lloyd-Bostock, S.M. (1979). Common Sense Morality and Accident Compensation. In: Farrington, D.P., Hawkins, K., Lloyd-Bostock, S.M. (eds) Psychology, Law and Legal Processes. Oxford Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04248-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics