Abstract
A comparison of the twelve developed countries covered in this survey reveals that they may be divided into two main categories: those which have a constitutional or other law providing for a public right to administrative information, and those which do not. Seven countries are in the first category, while only five are in the second. Countries of the first type are the four in Scandinavia, the United States and the two East European countries. Those without such a right are the four other countries in Western Europe, and Canada.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Human Rights, Proceedings of the Colloquy of the Council of Europe on Freedom of Information and the Duty for Public Authorities to Make Available Information ( Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1977 ).
John McMillan, ‘Freedom of Information in Australia: Issue Closed’ Federal Law Review 8 (1977), 379–434.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1979 International Institute of Administrative Sciences
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rowat, D.C. (1979). Comparative Survey. In: Rowat, D.C. (eds) Administrative Secrecy in Developed Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04124-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04124-4_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-04126-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-04124-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)