Proxy Response in Social Surveys

  • Mavis Maclean
  • Hazel Genn
Chapter
Part of the Oxford Socio-Legal Studies book series

Abstract

A common method of reducing costs in both personal and mail surveys is to require one member of a household to provide information about himself personally and about others in the household by proxy. In personal interviewing, where the cost of interviewer time in locating an individual forms a substantial proportion of the final cost of the survey, the use of proxy respondents has a greater relative value than in postal work, where once an address has been selected the cost of approaching an individual there remains constant. As we preferred to conduct personal interviews in our study (cf. Chapter 5), for reasons of response rate and quality of data collected, we decided to test the effect of using proxy respondents in a personal interview. We were concerned to discover not only the extent of the information loss which might result from using proxy respondents to provide information about all members of a household, but of equal importance was the need to investigate what kinds of biased reporting, if any, might result, and whether such bias or random loss could be reduced by selecting a particular household member as respondent.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ballweg, J. A., ‘Husband and Wife Response Similarities on Evaluative and Non- evaluative Survey Questions’, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 33 (1969) pp. 249 - 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biderman, A. D., Report on a Pilot Study in the District of Columbia on Victimisation and Attitudes Towards Law Enforcement, President’s Commission on Law Enforce- ment and Administration of Justice, Field Survey 1 ( Washington, DC: US Govern- ment Printing Office, 1967 ).Google Scholar
  3. Cartwright, A., ‘The Effect of Obtaining Information from Different Family Informants on a Family Morbidity Enquiry’, Applied Statistics, vol. 6 (1957) pp. 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cochran, W. G., ‘Some Methods of Strengthening the Common 7C2 Tests’, Biometrics, vol. 10 (1954) pp. 417–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferber, R., ‘On the Reliability of Responses Secured in Sample Surveys’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 50 (1961) pp. 788–810.Google Scholar
  6. Mooney, H. W., Methodology in Two Californian Health Surveys, San Jose and Statewide, US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Monograph No. 70 ( Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1962 ).Google Scholar
  7. Morgan, J. N., ‘Some Pilot Studies of Communication and Consensus in the Family’, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 32 (1968) pp. 113–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Social Science Research Council 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mavis Maclean
  • Hazel Genn

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations