Abstract
Having rejected alternative sources of data for our survey of compensation and support and accepted that empirical work must be undertaken, we began to confront the problems of definition. What precisely were the misfortunes we were to screen for? The project set out to examine the social and economic consequences of illness and injury, i.e. we had an area of interest, not a quantifiable variable. The reason for our interest in the topic added to our difficulties. We were concerned that the law of tort in relation to compensation for personal injury was covering only a subsection of the population which might be suffering the effects of illness and injury. We were working outwards from an over-strictly defined subgroup towards an unknown quantity — the total ‘victim’ population. However, in one sense the entire general population are victims of the social and economic consequences of illness and injury in that no one enjoys perfect health all of the time. What sort of cut-off point on the continuum of illness and injury were we to adopt? To develop a definition of a population whose very nature we wished to investigate led us into long, irreconcilable discussions about the nature of the distinction between our group of victims and the total population. Were we to be concerned with a group who differ from the norm of health and illness either in relation to their peer group (which would involve accepting, for example, limited mobility as ‘normal’ for the over-70s) or in relation to the ideal type, i.e. a young fit adult?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berdit, M. and Williamson, J. W., ‘Functional Limitations Scale for Measuring Health Outcomes’, in B. Berg (ed), Health Status Indexes ( Chigago: Hospital Research and Educational Trust, 1973 ).
Brown, G. W. and Harris, T., Social Origins of Depression: A Study of Psychiatric Disorder in Women ( London: Tavistock, 1978 ).
Burman, S. B., Genn, H. G. and Lyons, J., ‘Pilot Study of the Use of Legal Services by Victims of Accidents in the Home’, Modern Law Review, vol. 40 (1977) pp. 47–57.
Carroll, D., ‘A Quantitative Test of Upper Extremity Function’, Journal of Chronic Diseases, vol. 18 (1965) p. 479.
Cronbach, L. J., Essentials of Psychological Testing, 3rd ed. ( New York: Harper & Row, 1970 ).
Cullinan, T., Visually Handicapped of Canterbury (Canterbury: Health Services Research Unit, University of Kent, 1978 ).
Garrad, J. and Bennett, A. E., ‘A Validated Interview Schedule for Use in Population Surveys of Chronic Disease and Disability’, British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine, vol. 25 (1971) pp. 97 - 104.
Goldberg, D., The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire, Maudsley Monograph ( London: Oxford Unversity Press, 1972 ).
Harris, A. I., Handicapped and Impaired in Great Britain (London: HMSO, 1971 ).
Jefferys, M., Millard, J. B., Hyman, M. and Warren, M. D., ‘A Set of Tests for Measuring Motor Impairment’, Journal of Chronic Diseases, vol. 22 (1969) pp. 303–19.
Katz, S. et al., ‘A New Classification of Functional Status in Activities of Daily Living’, Journal of Chronic Diseases, vol. 9 (1959) pp. 55–62.
Kleck, R., ‘Physical Stigma and Non-verbal Cues Emitted in Face to Face Interactions’, Human Relations, vol. 21 (1968) pp. 19–29.
Linn, L. S., ‘Verbal Attitudes and Overt Behaviour’, Social Forces, vol. 44 (1965) pp. 353–64.
Manis, J. G., Brawer, M. J., Hunt, C. L. and Kercher, L. C., ‘Validating a Mental Health Scale’, American Sociological Review, vol. 28 (1963) pp. 108–16.
Mooney, W. A., Methodology in the California Health Surveys, San Jose 1952 and Statewide 1954-5, Public Health Monograph no. 70, US Department of Health, Education and Welfare (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1962 ).
Moser, C. and Kalton, G., Survey Methods in Social Investigation ( London: Heinemann, 1971 ).
Nagi, S. Z., ‘Congruency in Medical and Self Assessment of Disability’, Industrial Medicine and Surgery, vol. 38, no. 3. (March 1969) pp. 27–36.
Oakley, A., Housewife (London: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, 1974 ).
Oppenheim, A. N., Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement ( London: Heinemann, 1966 ).
Pilling, D., The Handicapped Child: Research Review, vol. III ( London: Longman, 1973 ).
Pinker, R. A. and Maclean, M., Dependency and Welfare ( London: Social Science Research Council, 1974 ).
Sainsbury, S., Measuring Disability, Occasional Papers on Social Administration, no. 54 ( London: Bell, 1973 ).
Simkins, J. (ed), Whose Benefit? (London:Economic Intelligence Unit, 1978).
Slack, K. M., Social Administration and the Citizen ( London: Michael Joseph, 1966 ).
Department of Health, Education and Welfare (DHEW), Factors Related to Response in a Health Examination Survey, series 2, no. 36 ( Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1969 ).
DHEW, Optimum Recall Period for Reportive Persons Injured in Motor Vehicle Ac- cidents, series 2, no. 50 ( Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1972 ).
DHEW, US Health Examination Survey, series 2, no. 11 ( Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1968 ).
Wiggins, J. S., Personality and Prediction: Principles of Personality Assessment ( London: Addison-Wesley, 1973 ).
Wood, P., Classification of Impairments and Handicaps ( Manchester: Epidemiology Research Unit, 1975 ).
Copyright information
© 1979 Social Science Research Council
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maclean, M., Genn, H. (1979). Developing a Screening Instrument. In: Methodological Issues in Social Surveys. Oxford Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04060-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04060-5_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-04062-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-04060-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)