The Sacred Poem

  • David Trotter

Abstract

Cowley’s resolve, formulated in the elegy on Crashaw, to write about ‘things Daine’ found expression in his epic poem about the life of David, the Davideis. In his Life of Cowley, Thomas Sprat made out that the poem had been ‘wholly written’ early in Cowley’s career, before the outbreak of civil war, but I think we should place it in the period between 1650 and 1654, as Kermode has argued.1 I shall show that the Davideis expresses anti-monarchist sentiments quite explicit enough to trouble Sprat, who was only too aware of the harm further revelations about Cowley’s wavering political loyalties might do. Sprat could not, perhaps, suppress parts of the poem, in the way he had suppressed a part of the 1656 Preface, but he could reduce the chances of people scouring it for political allusions by claiming that it was ‘wholly written’ before the Great Rebellion—by dissociating it from the early 1650s, the period of Cowley’s return to England and acquiescence in Republican rule. The Davideis was not, like The Mistress, an apprenticeship, the occupation of an already privileged form; rather, it attempted to revive and to alter a traditional code (epic convention) in such a way as to produce a new message (the Word of God):

Too long the Muses-Land have Heathen bin;

Their Gods too long were Dea’ils, and Vertues Sin;

But Thou, Eternal Word, hast call’d forth Me

Th’ Apostle, to convert that World to Thee;

T’unbind the charms that in slight Fables lie,

And teach that Truth is truest Poesie. (P,243)

Keywords

Burning Assure Assimilation Paral Lost 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ‘The Date of Cowley’s Davideis’, p. 158.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Muse’s Hannibal, pp. 153–4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Judah’s Return to their Allegiance, and David’s Return to his Crown and Kingdom (1660) p. 1; cited by R. F. Jones, ‘The Originality of Absalom and Achitophel’, MLN, 46 (1931) pp. 211–8.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cf. J. A. Mazzeo, ‘Cromwell as Davidic King’, in Renaissance and Seventeenth-Century Studies.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Majestas Intemerata (1649) p. 94. I owe the reference to T. R. Langley.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    James I, The True Law of free Monarchies (Edinburgh, 1598) Sigs B5 recto, B7 verso, B7 verso-B8 recto;Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Cook, King Charles, His Case (1649), in The Trial of King Charles the First, J. G. Muddiman (ed.) (Edinburgh, n.d.) p. 236; Filmer, Patriarcha and Other Political Writings, p. 97; Hobbes, Leviathan, Oakeshott (ed.), p. 134.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Complete Prose Works, III, pp. 202–3, 212, 206.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    ‘Time, History and Eschatology in the Thought of Thomas Hobbes’, p. 171.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    Leviathan, pp. 312, 314, 78–9, 269.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    ‘Time, History and Eschatology’, p. 173.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Speeches, W. C. Abott (ed.), 4 volumes (Cambridge, Mass., 1937–47) III, p. 589.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    edition, O Hehir, p. 160.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    J. M. Steadman, Milton and the Renaissance Hero, p. vi.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    One of Humphrey Moseley’s catalogues, bound in with an edition of Waller’s Poems (1645), describes a Latin version of the Davideis as forthcoming. It never appeared.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    Lives, I, p. 54.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    Aristotle, Rhetoric; Ramus, Dialectique; cited by W. S. Howell, Logic and Rhetoric in England, pp. 68,155–6.Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    Howell, ibid., pp. 375, 376; Hill, Society and Puritanism, p. 404.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    See above, pp. 00.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    C. A. Patrides, ‘The Renaissance View of Time: A Bibliographical Note’, NQ 208 (1963) pp. 408–10.Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    Hobbes, Of Liberty and Necessity, English Works, IV, p. 270 (see also ibid., pp. 298–300 and Bramhall, Works, 5 volumes [Oxford, 1842–51 IV, pp. 523–4); Pocock, ‘Time, History and Eschatology’, pp. 174, 178; Milton, Christian Doctrine, Complete Prose Works, VI, pp. 313–14; Paradise Lost, V, lines 580–3, Works, II, i, p. 164.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Trotter 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Trotter

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations