Advertisement

Contraception and population trends

  • Brian Cook
Part of the Biology and Environment book series (SBES)

Abstract

Throughout most of man’s existence on Earth, his numbers have been small and have increased only slowly. Four natural checks served to keep the population low; a short life expectancy, a high neonatal mortality, a late age at puberty and a long interval between births. The recent growth of urban, industrial society disrupted these checks and caused the population to soar, last century in countries that are now affluent, this century in the Third World. The increase in population was a result of falling death rates rather than increasing birth rates. After a while, birth rates began to fall in developed societies as parents perceived that more children were surviving to become adults. In urban societies, children are economic liabilities; they require expensive food, shelter and education, and too many of them mean that resources for the family as a whole become insufficient. Initially, contraception probably played only a minor role in reducing the birth rate, but over the last quarter of a century in developed societies, it has become a major factor in stabilising population growth.

Keywords

Family Planning Population Trend Circulatory Disease Oral Contraception Legal Abortion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, C. R. (1972). The ethics of manipulating human reproduction, in Reproduction in Mammals, Book 5, Artificial Control of Reproduction (ed. C. R. Austin and R. V. Short), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 141– 52Google Scholar
  2. Beral, V. and Kay, C. R. (1977). Mortality among oral contraceptive users, Lancet, ii, 727 – 31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boston Women’s Health Book Collective (1972). Our Bodies Ourselves: A Book By and For Women, Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, L. (1978). The Twenty-Ninth Day, Population Reports, Series E, No. 5Google Scholar
  5. Cartwright, A. (1979). Family size, contraceptive practice and fertility intentions in England and Wales, 1967 –1975, Family Planning Perspectives, 11, 128 – 35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman, E. R. (1974). L’Infanticide dans le haut moyen âge, Annales Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations, 2, 315 – 35Google Scholar
  7. Cook, B. (1976). Hormones of reproduction, in Reproductive Physiology of Mammals and Birds, 3rd edn (ed. A. V. Nalbandov), W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 181– 219Google Scholar
  8. Culliton, B. J. (1979). China’s new birth policy: one baby is enough, Science, N. Y., 206, 429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Djerassi, C. (1969). Prognosis for the development of new chemical birth control agents, Science, N.Y., 166, 468–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Djerassi, C. (1970). Birth control after 1984, Science, N.Y., 169, 941– 51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Djerassi, C. (1976). The manufacture of steroidal contraceptives: technical versus political aspects, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 195, 175–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duncan, G. W. and Wheeler, R. G. (1975). Pharmacological and mechanical control of implantation, Biol. Reprod., 12, 143–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dziuk, P. J. and Cook, B. (1964). Passage of steroids through silicone rubber, Endocrinology, 78, 208–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eckholm, E. and Newland, K. (1977). Health: the Family Planning Factor, Population Reports, Series J, No. 14Google Scholar
  15. Elstein, M. (1979). Oral contraception reviewed, IPPF Med. Bull., 13(3), 1– 2PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Foreit, J. R. Gorosh, M. E., Gillespie, D. G. and Merritt, C. G. (1978). Family Planning Programs, Population Reports, Series J, No. 19Google Scholar
  17. Forrest, J. D., Tietze, C. and Sullivan, E. (1978). Abortion in the United States, 1976–1977, Family Planning Perspectives, 10, 271– 9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman, E. W. (1978). Abortion: subjective attitudes and feelings, Family Planning Perspectives, 10, 150–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Green, C. P. (1978). Voluntary Sterilization: World’s Leading Contraceptive Methed, Population Reports, Special Topic Monographs, No. 2Google Scholar
  20. Harper, M. J. K. (1977). Contraception — retrospect and prospect, Progr. Drug Res., 21, 293–407Google Scholar
  21. Huber, S. C., Piotrow, P. T., Orlans, F. B. and Kommer, G. (1975). IUDs Reassessed — A Decade of Experience, Population Reports, Series B, No. 2Google Scholar
  22. Huber, S. C., Piotrow, P. T., Potts, M., Isaacs, S. L. and Ravenholt, R. T. (1975). Family Planning Programs, Population Reports, Series J, No. 5Google Scholar
  23. Illich, I. (1977). Limits to Medicine, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, MiddlesexGoogle Scholar
  24. Kendall, M. (1979). The World Fertility Survey: Current Status and Findings, Population Reports, Series M, No. 3Google Scholar
  25. Lind, A. W. (1938). An Island Community, The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. McNeilly, A. S. (1979). Effects of lactation on fertility, Br. med. Bull., 35, 151– 4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Main, S. J., Davies, R. V. and Setchell, B. P. (1979). The evidence that inhibin must exist, J. Reprod. Fert., Suppl. 26, 3–14Google Scholar
  28. Maine, D. (1978). Depo: the debate continues, Family Planning Perspectives, 10, 342–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mosely, W. H., Osteria, T. and Huffman, S. L. (1977). Interactions of contraception and breast-feeding in developing countries, J. biosoc. Sci., Suppl. 4, 93 –111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orlans, F. B. (1973). Copper IUDs — Performance up to Date, Population Reports, Series B, No. 1Google Scholar
  31. Peel, J. and Potts, M. (1970). Textbook of Contraceptive Practice, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Piotrow, P. T., Rinehart, W. and Schmidt, J. C. (1979). IUDs — Update on Safety, Effectiveness and Research, Population Reports, Series B, No. 3Google Scholar
  33. Porter, J. F. (1973). The regulation of fertility, Res. Reprod., 5, No. 4 Google Scholar
  34. Rinehart, W. (1976). Postcoital Contraception — An Appraisal, Population Reports, Series J, No. 9Google Scholar
  35. Rinehart, W. and Piotrow, P. T. (1979). OCs — Update on Usage, Safety and Side Effects, Population Reports, Series A, No. 5Google Scholar
  36. Rinehart, W. and Winter J. (1975). Injectable Progestogens — Officials Debate but Use Increases, Population Reports, Series K, No. 1Google Scholar
  37. Rodriguez, G. (1979). Family planning availability and contraceptive practice, Family Planning Perspectives, 11, 51 – 70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ross, C. and Piotrow, P. T. (1974). Birth Control Without Contraceptives, Population Reports, Series I, No. 1Google Scholar
  39. Short, R. V. (1972). Reproduction and human society, in Reproduction in Mammals, Book 5, Artificial Control of Reproduction (ed. C. R. Austin and R. V. Short), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 114 – 40Google Scholar
  40. Short, R. V. (1976). The evolution of human reproduction, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 195, 3 – 24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Steinberger, A. (1979). Inhibin production by Sertoli cells in culture, J. Reprod. Fert.Suppl. 26, 31– 45Google Scholar
  42. Stokes, B. (1978). Filling Family Planning Gaps, Population Reports, Series J, No. 20Google Scholar
  43. Stopes, M. C. (1949). Contraception, 7th edn, Putnam, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Vaughan, B., Trussell, J., Menken, J. and Jones, E. F. (1977). Contraceptive failure among married women in the United States, 1970 – 1973, Family Planning Perspectives, 9, 251 – 8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vessey, M. P., McPherson, K. and Johnson, B. (1977). Mortality among women participating in the Oxford/Family Planning Association contraceptive study, Lancet, ii, 731– 3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Westoff, C. F. and Jones, E. F. (1977). The secularization of U.S. Catholic birth control practices, Family Planning Perspectives, 9, 203 – 7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Contributors 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Cook

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations