The Muse who addresses Hardy in the Vatican embodies more arts than those we have been considering. ‘But my love goes further’, says the poet, mentioning by name ‘Form’, ‘Story’, and ‘Hymn’. The place of Story in Hardy’s work is self-evident. His affinity, even in his novels, with the ballad-writers has often been remarked: his tale-telling, however refined by art, follows the ‘instinctive primitive narrative shape’ of that of old wives and minstrels, and he accepts the role of entertainer as both a duty and a delight. ‘Hymn’ also, taken in the sense of lyric or poetry, is not so. much a part of his work as its sine qua non. This is apparent, not from the poems alone, but also from what Jean Brooks has called ‘the poetic structure’ of the novels.1 Hardy was first and last a poet, and if in his work the Muses are, as the goddess of the Vatican says, one, this is ultimately because the other arts have there been converted into poetry: hers is the final shape of which these are the ‘phases’.
KeywordsSine Volatility Lost Verse Prose
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- I. Jean Brooks, Thomas Hardy: The Poetic Structure (London, 1971 ).Google Scholar
- 4.Kenneth Marsden, The Poems of Thomas Hardy, A Critical Introduction (London, 1969) 117.Google Scholar
- 7.F. E. Halliday,Thomas Hardy, His Life and Work(Bath, 1972) 16.Google Scholar
- 10.Edward Lockspeiser, Music and Painting: A Study in Comparative Ideas from Turner to Schoenberg (London, 1973) 47.Google Scholar
- 11.George Bernard Shaw, Major Critical Essays (London, 1932, repr. 1947) 265.Google Scholar
- 14.Clement Scott, From “The Bells” to “King Arthur” (London, 1896) 320.Google Scholar
- 19.Marcel Proust, Time Regained trans. Andreas Mayor, paperback edition (London, 1970) 256–7.Google Scholar