Meredith saw Beauckamp’s Career as an attempt to break away from the novel ‘of the real story telling order’ of the 1860s, and he referred to it as a ‘monstrous innovation’ which, as he says in his letter to Conway, has ‘no powerful stream of adventure’ (1, 485).
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Edward Clodd, Memories (1916) p. 146.Google Scholar
- 3.Barbara Hardy, ‘Introduction’ in The Appropriate Form (1964) pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
- 4.See Kenneth Graham, English Criticism of the Novel 1865–1900 ( 1965) pp. 34–8.Google Scholar
- 5.Bertrand Russell, A Journal of the History of Ideas, 1 (1940) p. 33.Google Scholar
- 9.Eugene Goodheart, The Cult of the Ego (Chicago: 1968) p. 78.Google Scholar
- 11.Barbara Hardy (ed.), Critical Essays on George Eliot (1970) p. 104.Google Scholar
- 23.Jack Lindsay, George Meredith (1953) p. 205.Google Scholar
- 30.Albert J. LaValley, Carlyle and the Idea of the Modern (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968) p. 246.Google Scholar