Abstract
The history of Anglo-American relations in the defence field in the immediate post-war period in some, although not in all, respects corresponded with the basic pattern of relations of Anglo-American relations as a whole. Despite the difficulties and imperfections, the relationship during the war had been extraordinarily close. In the late 1940s some of this intimacy was to return as important informal links were developed and both countries worked closely in the development of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. For the moment, however, in the two immediate post-war years, the relationship cooled as important differences arose.
The author is indebted to Arnold Wolfer’s study, Discord and Collaboration: Essays in International politics, (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1967) for the title of this chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
M. Gowing, Independence and Deterrence: Britain and Atomic Energy, 1945–52, Vol.I ( London: Macmillan, 1974 ), p. 94.
See Rt.Hon. Lord Sherfield, ‘Britain’s nuclear story, 1945–52: Politics and technology’, Round Table, April 1975, No. 258, p. 194.
See D. Charlton, ‘Great Britain and nuclear weapons: the academic inquest’, British Journal of International Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2, July 1976.
F. Williams, A Prime Minister Remembers ( London: Heineman, 1961 ), p. 117.
See Sir Leonard Owen, ‘Nuclear Engineering in the United Kingdom: The First Ten Years’, Journal of the British Nuclear Energy Society, January 1963.
See R.R. James (ed.), Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963 Vol. VII, op.cit. pp.7285–93.
W. Millis (ed.), The Forrestal Diaries (London: Cassell, 1952), p.1851–856.
Field-Marshal Montgomery, The Memoirs of Field-Marshal the Viscount Montgomery of Alamein, K.G. ( London: Coffins, 1958 ), p. 437.
See C.J. Bartlett, The Long Retreat: A Short History of British Defence Policy, 1945–70 ( London: Macmillan, 1972 ), p. 47.
R.N. Rosecrance, Defense of the Realm: British Strategy in the Nuclear Epoch ( London: Columbia University Press, 1968 ), p. 50.
G. Williams and B. Reed, Denis Healey and the Policies of Power ( London: Sidgwick & Jackson, 1971 ), p. 71.
See P. Williams, ‘The United States and Western Europe: A conditional commitment’, Interstate, Vo1.3, No.2, 1978, pp. 1620.
A. Pierre, Nuclear Politics: The British Experience with an Independent Strategic Force, 1939–1970 ( London: Oxford University Press, 1972 ), p. 129.
R.G. Hewlett and F. Duncan, The History of USAEC: Atomic Shield Vo1.II, 1947–52 (Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State University Press, 1969), p.279 and passim (author’s emphasis).
See R. Dawson and R. Rosecrance, ‘Theory and reality in the Anglo-American Alliance’, World Politics, Vol. 19, 1966–7.
see J. Baylis, ‘The Anglo-American relationship in defence’, in British Defence Policy in a Changing World ( London: Croom Helm, 1977 ), p. 73.
Copyright information
© 1981 John Baylis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baylis, J. (1981). Discord and Collaboration 1945–1949. In: Anglo-American Defence Relations 1939–1980. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03723-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03723-0_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-03725-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-03723-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)