Organizational Analysis through Group Processes: A Theoretical Perspective for Organization Development

  • Suresh Srivastva
  • Steven L. Obert
  • Eric H. Neilsen

Abstract

It is not coincidental that both the American and European traditions of organization development began in intellectual centers with profound dedication to the understanding of face-to-face groups. In America, Kurt Lewin and his students carried out some of the early social psychological research into small group behavior and founded the Research Center for Group Dynamics and the National Training Laboratories; and they contributed to the development of a framework for action research methodology which was followed by the first social science based intervention into an industrial organization (Marrow, 1969). In Europe the now widely practiced socio-technical perspective was developed at the Tavistock Institute, where W.R. Bion completed one of the first truly classical works on small group theory (Cummings and Srivastva, 1976).

Keywords

Europe Shipping Marketing Straw Production Line 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Argyris, C., Personality and Organization ( New York: Harper and Row, 1957 ).Google Scholar
  2. Ashkenas, R., ‘Early Dissonance Reduction Among Medical Students: The Setting of Professional Patterns’ (unpublished qualifying paper, Case Western Reserve University, 1976 ).Google Scholar
  3. Bennis, W. and Shepard, H., ‘A Theory of Group Development’ in Bennis, Benne, and Chin (eds.), The Planning of Change: Readings in the Applied Behavioral Sciences, ( New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1961 ).Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. and Luckmann, T., The Social Construction of Reality ( New York: Doubleday, 1966 ).Google Scholar
  5. Cummings, T.G. and Srivastva, S., The Management of Work (Kent, Ohio: CARI Kent State University, 1976 ).Google Scholar
  6. Erikson, E., Identity, Youth and Crisis ( New York: Norton Co., 1968 ).Google Scholar
  7. Freud, S., Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego ( New York: Bantam, 1960 ).Google Scholar
  8. Goffman, E., Asylums ( New York: Doubleday/Anchor, 1961 ).Google Scholar
  9. Homas, G., The Human Group (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Co., 1950 ).Google Scholar
  10. Hulin, C. and Blood, M., ‘Job Enlargement, Individual Differences and Worker Responses’, Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69 (1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Likert, R., New Patterns in Management ( New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961 ).Google Scholar
  12. Lombard, G., Behavior in a Selling Group (Boston, Mass.: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1955 ).Google Scholar
  13. McGregor, D., Human Side of Enterprise ( New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960 ).Google Scholar
  14. Mann, R., Gibbard, G. and Hartman, J., Interpersonal Styles and Group Development ( New York: Wiley, 1967 ).Google Scholar
  15. Marrow, A.J., The Practical Theorist ( New York: Basic Books, 1969 ).Google Scholar
  16. Maslow, A., Motivation and Personality ( New York: Harper and Bros., 1954 ).Google Scholar
  17. Mead,’G.H., Mind, Self, and Society ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934 ).Google Scholar
  18. Mills, T., Group Transformation: An Analysis of a Learning Group (Englewood Cliffs,N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964).Google Scholar
  19. Obert, S., ‘Inclusion, Influence and Intimacy in Group Dynamics’ (unpublished working paper, Case Western Reserve University, 1976 ).Google Scholar
  20. Obert, S,’The Kaleidoscope of Group Life’ (unpublished working paper, Case Western Reserve University, 1976 ).Google Scholar
  21. Schutz, W., FIRO: A Three-Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behavior ( New York: Rinehart and Co., 1958 ).Google Scholar
  22. Slater, P., Microcosm ( New York: Wiley, 1966 ).Google Scholar
  23. Srivastva, S., ‘Towards a Social Psychology of Management: Some Neglected Variables’ in S. Srivastva, Behavioral Sciences in Management ( Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1967 ).Google Scholar
  24. Thompson, J., Organizations in Action ( New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967 ).Google Scholar
  25. Zalenznik, A., Christensen, C. and Roethlisberger, F., The Motivation, Productivity and Satisfaction of Workers: A Prediction Study (Boston, Mass.: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1958 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Suresh Srivastva, Steven L. Obert and Eric H. Neilsen 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suresh Srivastva
  • Steven L. Obert
  • Eric H. Neilsen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations