Advertisement

The Preferred Valuation Methodology: The Valuation of Reduction in Risk of Death

  • Gavin H. Mooney
Chapter

Abstract

It is perhaps worth emphasising at the beginning of this chapter that there is no apparent readily available ideal solution to the problem of valuation of human life. There are grounds for believing however, as previous chapters have already indicated, that some (but not all) of those efforts which have been made in the past to value life have been somewhat misconceived. This has increased the difficulties in attempting to take economics into this field and to use it to improve decision-making in life-saving activities. There is no single method which will immediately allow benefits of reductions in mortality to be measured in a wholly satisfactory way. None the less it is possible to outline the type of approach which is likely to lead us along the right path—even although we must for the moment consider the approach principally from a conceptual and theoretical point of view and record some doubts as to its applicability in practice. While this is not wholly satisfactory, it does mean that we can at least narrow the field of possible methods to the one which appears most likely to be acceptable.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Drèze, J., L’utilité sociale d’une vie humaine, Rev. Franc. Rech. Oper. (1962)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schelling, T. C., The life you save may be your own. In Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis, ed. S. B. Chase, Brookings Institute, Washington (1968)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zeckhauser, R., Uncertainty and the need for collective action. In Public Expenditure and Policy Analysis, ed. R. H. Haveman and J. Margolis, Markham Publishing Company, Chicago (1970)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bailey, M., Comment on Schelling. In Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis, ed. S. B. Chase, Brookings Institute, Washington (1968)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones-Lee, M. W., Valuation of reduction in probability of death by road accident, J. Transport Econ. Pol., Jan. (1969)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jones-Lee, M. W., The value of changes in the probability of death or injury, J. Polit. Econ., 82, No. 4, 835–850, Aug. (1974)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones-Lee, M. W., The Value of Life. An Economic Analysis, Martin Robertson, London (1976)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hirshleifer, J., Investment decisions under uncertainty—choicetheoretic approaches, Q. J. Econ., May (1966)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ramsey, F. P., The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, Kegan Paul, London (1931)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Savage, L. J., The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley, New York (1954)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shackle, G. L. S., Expectation in Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1949)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour, Princeton University Press, New Jersey (1953)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mishan, E. J., Cost Benefit Analysis, George Allen and Unwin, London, chapters 22 and 23 (1971)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bernoulli, D., Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Reproduced in Econometrica, Jan. (1954)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Large Industrial Sites National Economic Development Council, HMSO (1970)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kletz, T. A., Hazard Analysis: A Quantitative Approach to Safety, ICI (1968)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Melinek, S. J., A method of evaluating human life for economic purposes, Accident Anal. Prey., Oct. (1974)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghosh, D., Lees, D., and Seal, W., Optimal motorway speed and some valuations of time and life, Manchester School Econ. Soc. Stud., 43, No. 2, 134–143, June (1975)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Needleman, L., Valuing other people’s lives. In Manchester School Econ. Soc. Stud., 309–342, Dec. (1976)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gavin H. Mooney 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gavin H. Mooney
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Community MedicineUniversity of AberdeenScotland

Personalised recommendations