Abstract
Neither Russell nor Wittgenstein (after the Tractatus) spent much time on philosophical ethics. In this section, therefore, the parallels will be less personal although, I hope, no less valid. For Russell, I shall more or less substitute G. E. Moore, whose ethical theories are closely tied to a referential theory of meaning. And in the Elements of Ethics, Russell adopted Moore’s views that goodness is an indefinable quality which cannot be demonstrated, that one can make mistakes in identifying it, and that a right action is one leading to the most goodness. For Wittgenstein I shall not need to substitute anyone in particular, though I shall be partly concerned, as many moral philosophers have been since, say, the second world war, with the metaethical implications of later Wittgensteinian ideas.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1977 Chris Gudmunsen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gudmunsen, C. (1977). Ethics and Religion. In: Wittgenstein and Buddhism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03128-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03128-3_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-03130-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-03128-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)