Skip to main content

The Justification of the Order

  • Chapter
The Novel of Adultery
  • 9 Accesses

Abstract

The pattern of death and destruction which, with the significant exceptions that have been noted, encompasses the act of adultery must raise the question of the validity of its own compulsion. One way of trying to answer such a question is to ask, more simply, whether the reader of the novels, having seen the issue raised and resolved by the various authors, feels the given outcome to be justified or not; and in either eventuality to try to ascertain at what level the justification operates, or fails to — whether the grounds for the punishment of the nineteenth-century adulterer/adulteress arise out of relativities like convention or economics, or out of more profound psychological, religious, or even mystical imperatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. Poggioli, The Phoenix and the Spider ( Cambridge, Mass., 1957 ) p. 70.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. P. J. Yarrow, La Pensée politique et religieuse de Barbey d’Aurevilly (Geneva, and Paris, 1961) p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Steiner, Tolstoy or Dostoevsky (Peregrine ed., 1967) p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Morris, The Naked Ape (Corgi ed., 1968) p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1976 Judith Armstrong

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Armstrong, J. (1976). The Justification of the Order. In: The Novel of Adultery. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02968-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics