Abstract
My task is to examine what gains and losses might result from a reorganisation of education in England on the lines set out in the Kilbrandon Report; but one or two preliminary generalisations may be worth making.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Royal Commission on the Constitution, Devolution and Other Aspects of Government: An Attitudes Survey Research Paper 7 (HMSO, 1973).
Expenditure Committee, Session 1972–3, Further and Higher Education, vol. II (HMSO, 1973 ) p. 10.
J. A. G. Griffith, Central Departments and Local Authorities (George Allen and Unwin, 1966 ).
Royal Commission on the Constitution, Written Evidence 9: United Kingdom (HMSO, 1972), p. 21.
Department of Education and Science, Education: A Framework for Expansion Cmnd. 5174 (HMSO, 1972) para. 87.
Department of Education and Science, Teacher Education and Training: Report of Committee of Inquiry (HMSO, 1972).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1975 Centre for Studies in Social Policy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Raison, T. (1975). Regional Devolution and Education. In: Craven, E. (eds) Regional Devolution and Social Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02733-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02733-0_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-02735-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-02733-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)