Christian Theism: Some Problems of Definition and Methodology

Part of the Library of Philosophy and Religion book series


Part of the argument of the preceding chapters was in support of identifying the CEB not only with the God of religion but with the Christian God. Yet the manner of this identification had implications about the nature of Christianity, for example with regard to miracles, the incarnation, the atonement, the trinity and the nature of God, which would be rejected by many or indeed most Christians. The question must therefore be raised whether the position outlined there deserves the label ‘Christian’.


Christian Theology Basic Analogy Abstract Identity Preceding Chapter Divine Action 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. P. Owen, Concepts of Deity (London: Macmillan, 1970 ) pp. 19–20, 21.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    H. Meynell, God and the World: The Coherence of Christian Theism ( London: S.P.C.K., 1971 ) p. 63.Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    P. C. Appleby, ‘On Religious Attitudes’, Religious Studies, vi (Dec 1970) 368.Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    C. Hartshorne, The Divine Relativity: A Social Conception of God ( New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1948 ) p. 38.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    N. Pike, God and Timelessness ( London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970 ) pp. 189–90.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    C. Hartshorne and W. L. Reese, Philosophers Speak of God (Univ. of Chicago Press, Phoenix Books, 1963) pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    J. Royce, The Sources of Religious Insight ( Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1912 ) p. 29.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    N. Smart, ‘Myth and Transcendence’, The Monist, L (Oct 1966) 487.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John J. Shepherd 1975

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations