Skip to main content

Cunard and the Emigrant Trade 1860–1900

  • Chapter
Cunard and the North Atlantic 1840–1973
  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

The British and North American Royal Mail Steam Packet Co., having survived the first threat of serious competition and having widened the scope of its operations through its associated company by opening up trade with the Mediterranean, now turned to the problem of increasing returns from the North Atlantic trade. It was a fact well understood by most Liverpool shipowners that the evolution of the steamship could not have taken place without the increase in demand for cargo and passenger accommodation. It was a prime reason why, in 1860, the Cunard partners decided to enter the steerage business. By that date it had become obvious that the profits accruing from the Government Contract to carry mail and that from high-class cabin traffic and freight, could not sustain expansion; that in fact, despite the hazards of competition, a more lucrative form of enterprise would henceforth lie in the carriage of emigrant traffic across the Atlantic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. J. Maginnis, Atlantic Ferry (1900)

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Hyde, Liverpool and the Mersey (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charlotte Erickson, ‘The Impact of Push and Pull’, Nordic Emigration, Uppsala University Research Conference 1969, 34–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. E. Hyde, op. cit., Chapter 6, Section I, pp. 95 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  5. U.S. Treasury Dept., Arrivals of Alien Passengers and Immigrants into the United States from1820 to1893 (1893). The complexity of U.S. immigration statistics is fully analysed in

    Google Scholar 

  6. et seq. The various fluctuations in the level of emigration to the United States given in the chapter are linked to the earning capacity of the various Liverpool shipping companies and do not, therefore, always coincide with the more exact determination of fluctuations derived by Brinley Thomas from his analysis. For a further analysis of the American economy see

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. McCormick and C. M. Franks, ‘A Self-Generating Model of Long-Swings for the American Economy 1860–1940’, The Journal of Economic History, XXXI, No. 2, June 1971, 295–343.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Hyde, op. cit., pp. 112–3

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Hansen, The Atlantic Migration (1961), p. 291.

    Google Scholar 

  10. immigration statistics, Treasury Dept., op. cit., to 1895; Reports of Bureau of Immigration from 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bastin, op. cit., p. 8, quoting from O. MacDonagh, A Pattern of Government Growth1800 to 1860 (1961), p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Though this statement refers to emigration through the port of Liverpool, the relative pattern is observable in the figures quoted by Brinley Thomas, op. cit., p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brinley Thomas, op. cit., p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. L. Hansen, op. cit., p. 292.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Olaf Thorn, op. cit., pp. 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Bastin, op. cit., p. 11, quoting Report on Emigration and Immigration (Foreigners) PP. (1889) X.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brinley Thomas, op. cit., p. 157.

    Google Scholar 

  19. CP, Reports of directors to be submitted to AGM, 22 March 1894 and 29 March 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Jones, American Immigration (1960), p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  23. CP, Shipping advertisements giving details of voyages, fares and accommodation, 1860–80.

    Google Scholar 

  24. CP, Moorhouse Diary, 1884–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. CP, Shipping advertisements of voyages, fares and accommodation 1890–1900; BM, No. 2, 1886–93, passim.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Bastin, op. cit., p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Minutes of Evidence taken before the S. C. on Mail Contracts1868; evidence by William Inman Q.1688 et seq., 20 March 1869.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid.; 686.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Chapter 5, Section I.

    Google Scholar 

  31. VR, OGM, 27 April 1881; ibid., 10 April 1884.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid., 10 April 1884; ibid., 10 April 1885; CP, Moorhouse Diary 1884–5.

    Google Scholar 

  33. VR, OGM, 27 March 1889; ibid., 11 April 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  34. G. Albion, The Rise of New York Port (1815–1860) (1970), p. 327.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid., p. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bastin, op. cit., p. 57, quoting PP (1882) LXII (135), 2–37.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liverpool Record Office, Inman Line Official Guide 1878, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  39. W. Burgess, Reminiscences of an American Scholar (1934), pp. 86–8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. e.g. Teutonic (1889) twin-screw, steel, 9860 gross tons, 17,500 I.H.P., could carry 586 first and 566 steerage passengers; Campania (1893) twin-screw, steel, 12,950 gross tons, 26,000 I.H.P., could carry 526 first, zoo second and 300 steerage passengers. Teutonic had a speed of 20.35 knots, Campania 21 knots.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Philadelphia Record, 9 August 1903, quoted by R. Bastin, op. cit., p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. Maginnis, op. cit., p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  43. According to J. Kennedy, A History of Steam Navigation (1903), p. 107, the steerage carryings to New York were Guion 27,054 and Cunard 16,871.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Brinley Thomas, op. cit., pp. 117–8.

    Google Scholar 

  45. R. Bastin, op. cit., p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  46. CP, Directors’ report and accounts for 1890–1911.

    Google Scholar 

  47. CP, Correspondence between Vernon Brown and D. Jardine, 1890–1900 with reference to the operation of specific ships.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Brinley Thomas, op. cit., pp. 93, 160.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ibid., pp. 156–7.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ibid., 24–5.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ibid., 24–30; evidence given by Samuel Cunard.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ibid., 31.

    Google Scholar 

  53. This was implied in John Burns’s evidence before the Select Committee on Mail Contracts, 20 March 1869 and confirmed in subsequent annual accounts of the Company.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Figures compiled from W. S. Lindsay, A History of Merchant Shipping (1876) IV, 257 and

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kennedy, op. cit., p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  59. CP, Moorhouse Diary, ships’ returns 1884–6.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ibid., as shown in the above tables.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ibid., as shown in the above tables.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ibid., as shown in the above tables.

    Google Scholar 

  65. See Chapter 4 for rates quoted in the 1890s.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Brinley Thomas, op. cit., p. 380.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1975 Francis E. Hyde

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hyde, F.E. (1975). Cunard and the Emigrant Trade 1860–1900. In: Cunard and the North Atlantic 1840–1973. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02390-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics