Advertisement

The Factors Influencing the Surface Finish Produced by Grinding

  • C. Rubenstein
Chapter

Summary

The hypothesis that the surface roughness in grinding is a function both of the grit depth of cut and of the average plateau area per grit is proposed and evidence is cited which is consistent with this hypothesis. Deductions from this hypothesis, both qualitative and quantitative, are shown to be in accordance with published data. In this way, a large body of apparently unrelated factors are shown to be consistent with a single, coherent picture of the surface roughness generated in grinding.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. T. YANG and M. C. SHAW (1955). Trans. Am. Soc. mech. Engrs., 77, 645.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. OPITZ, W. ERNST and K. F. MEYER (1965). Proceedings of the 6th Int. M.T.D.R. Conference Pergamon Press, 581.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. TSUWA (1964). Trans. Am. Soc. mech. Engrs. Series B, 86, 371.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. E. McKEE, R. S. MOORE and O. W. BOSTON (1947). Trans. Am. Soc. mech. Engrs., 69, 891.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. S. HAHN and R. P. LINDSAY (1969). Proceedings of the 10th Int. M. T.D.R. Conference Pergamon Press. 95.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. R. BACKER, E. R. MARSHALL and M. C. SHAW (1952). Trans. Am. Soc. mech. Engrs., 74, 61.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. A. LINDENBECK (1970). Schleifen von Eisenwerkstoffen mit Diamantschleifscheiben, Dr-Ing. Dissertation, Technical University, Hannover.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. P. RUBERT (1959). Engineering, 188, 393.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. RUBENSTEIN (1967). Machinability (Iron and Steel Institute Conference on Machin-ability, London 1965), Iron and Steel Inst. Special Report Series No. 94, 49.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. RUBENSTEIN, F. K. GROSZMANN and F. KOENIGSBERGER (1967). Science and Technology of Industrial Diamonds (Proceedings of the International Industrial Diamond Conference, Oxford), vol. 1, 161. Industrial Diamond Information Bureau, London.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. J. KRABACHER (1959). Trans. Am. Soc. mech. Engrs., 81 (Series B), 187.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. A. LINDENBECK (1971). Ind. Diamond Rev., 36, 400.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. N. GREENHOW and C. RUBENSTEIN (1969). Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res. 9, 1.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. PACITTI and C. RUBENSTEIN (1972). Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res., 12, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. D. SINGHAL and H. KALIZER (1965). Proceedings of the 6th. Int. M. T.D.R. Conference Pergamon Press. 629.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. PAHLITZSCH and E. O. CUNTZE (1965). Proceedings of the 6th Int. M.T.D.R. Conference Pergamon Press, 507.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. PEKLENIK and H. OPITZ (1962). Proceedings of the 3rd Int. M. T.D.R. Conference Pergamon Press, 163.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    C. RUBENSTEIN (1972). Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res., 12, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. E. DAVIS and C. RUBENSTEIN (1972). Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res., 12, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. MAKINO (1966). Bull. Japan Soc. Prec. Eng., 1, 281.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    V. CONRADI. Diamond abrasive wheel technology, Diamond Information L. 13, De Beers Industrial Diamond Division.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. MATSUNAGA (1966). Report of the Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, vol. 16, no. 2, Serial No. 105.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    O. IMANAKA (1966). Annals CIRP, 13, 227.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Y. ISHIDA (1964). J. Mech. Lab. Japan, 10, 76.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. A. SAGARDA (1969). Machines and Tool-ing, 40, no. 7, 47.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    H. M. NAGI (1972). MSc dissertation, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Limited 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Rubenstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of the NegevBeershebaIsrael

Personalised recommendations