Present International Political System

  • Leo Yueh-Yun Liu


The present international system can be broadly described as a ‘loose bipolar system’. The term ‘loose bipolar’ represents only a very vague and artificial framework for describing the present situation for the sake of expediency. There are no really adequate terms which could be used to describe precisely what the state of the ‘international political system’ is.


Nuclear Weapon World Politics North Atlantic Treaty Organisation Universal Actor Nuclear Deterrence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hans Thirring, ‘Can We Sleep Soundly in the Shadow of the Hydrogen Bomb?’ Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, II (Feb 1955) 59–61.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stanley Hoffman, The State of War: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics ( New York: F. A. Praeger, 1965 ) p. 237.Google Scholar
  3. Thomas C. Schelling, ‘The Threat that Leaves Something to Chance’, in his The Strategy of Conflict ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1963 ) pp. 187–204.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    See Stanley Hoffman, The State of War, pp. 233–4. See also Ciro Elliott Zoppo, ‘Nuclear Technology, Multipolarity, and International Stability’, World Politics, 16, no. 4 (July 1966) 585.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Stanley Hoffman, ‘Nuclear Proliferation and World Politics’, A World of Nuclear Powers?, ed. Alastair Buchan ( Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1966 ) p. 93.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    See Robert L. Rothstein, Alliances and Small Powers (New York: Columbia University Press, 1968) pp. 238 ff.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    See Hayward R. Alker Jr. and Bruce M. Russett, World Politics in the General Assembly ( New Haven: Yale University Press, 1965 ).Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    See Earnst Lefever, ‘Nehru, Nasser, and Nkrumah on Neutralism’, Neutralism and Non-alignment, ed. Laurence Martin ( New York: F. A. Praeger, 1962 ).Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    Inis L. Claude Jr., Swords into Plowshares (New York: Random, 1971) pp. 312ff.Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    For further discussion on systems theory, see for example Stanley Hoffman, ‘International System and International Law’, World Politics, 14, no. 1 (Oct 1961) p. 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. David Easton, A Framework for Political Analysis (Englewood, Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1965 ).Google Scholar
  12. Morton A. Kaplan, System and Process in International Politics, Science Edition ( New York: John Wiley, 1964 ).Google Scholar
  13. Charles A. McClelland, Theory and the International System (New York; Macmillan Co., 1966 ).Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    Herman Kahn, Thinking about the Unthinkable, ( New York: Horizon Press, 1962 ) p. 223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leo Yueh-Yun Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Brandon UniversityCanada

Personalised recommendations