Skip to main content
  • 14 Accesses

Abstract

THE WORK of Maria Montessori and of Homer Lane made a deep impression on progressive education in this country after the First World War. Each of them claimed to have rediscovered the significance of freedom for children, but their practical conclusions were vastly different, so variant that with-out misprision they may be called the two magnetic poles round which for a time the lines of force in English innovatory education formed themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. E. Séguin, Idiocy and its Treatment by the Physiological Method (1866); Traitement Moral, Hygiène Éducation des Idiots (1846); New Facts and Remarks on Idiocy (1870); Report on Education (1876).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. E. M. G. Itard, An Historical Account of the Discovery and Education of a Savage Man (trans. 1802).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maria Montessori, The Secret of Childhood (Calcutta, 1936), pp. 274, 279, 281 –2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mario M. Montessori and C. A. Claremont, ‘Montessori and the Deeper Freedom ’, in Year Book of Education (1957), p. 426.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. MacMunn, A Path to Freedom in the School (London, 1914), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Grant, ‘St. George’s School: A Retrospect ’: address to St. George’s Parents ’ Association, 5 July 1941, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. P. Culverwell, Montessori Principles and Practice (London, 1913).

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. P. Nunn, Education: Its Data and First Principles (London, 1920), p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Margaret McMillan, ‘The Nursery School ’, Child Study Society, London, Journal of Proceedings, vi (1926), p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ‘A Former Student’ writing in G. A. N. Lowndes (ed.), Margaret McMillan (London, 1960), p. 33. This is a centenary volume produced a century after Margaret McMillan’s birth by the Nursery Schools Association.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. J. McCallister, The Growth of Freedom in Education (London, 1931), p. 430.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See W. R. George, Citizens Made and Remade (New York, 1913); The Junior Republic: Its History and Ideals (New York, 1910).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. T. Bazeley, Homer Lane and the Little Commonwealth (London, 1928 and 1948);

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. David Wills, Homer Lane (London, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. H. Simpson, Howson of Holt (London, 1925).

    Google Scholar 

  16. See J. H. Simpson, An Adventure in Education (London, 1917).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1972 W. A. C. Stewart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stewart, W.A.C. (1972). Preface to the Post-War Surgence. In: Progressives and Radicals in English Education 1750–1970. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01220-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01220-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-01222-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-01220-6

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics