Advertisement

Chapter Four

  • Henry Tudor
Chapter
Part of the Key Concepts in Political Science book series (KCP)

Abstract

I have suggested that a political myth is a set of similar arguments the individual meanings of which can not be determined apart from their context. Our discussion of the Roman Foundation Myth illustrates this point. Although far from comprehensive, it shows that, as the myth was transmitted from one generation to the next, its meaning and content changed giving us a series of individually distinct versions. None of these versions can be said to embody the ‘true’ meaning of the myth. Nor is there a single ‘core’ doctrine to which all versions, however diverse, can be reduced. Had we been able to discuss the later uses to which the myth was put—for instance, by opponents of papal power in the Middle Ages, by republican orators during the French Revolution or by Italian Fascists in the twentieth century—the point would have been made even clearer. A political myth is not a world-view which somehow persists unchanged through all its particular manifestations. It is, rather, what Wittgenstein would call a ‘family’ of arguments.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    D. R. Bultmann, History and Eschatology, The Gifford Lectures, Edinburgh, 1957, p. 23.Google Scholar
  2. 13.
    J. W. Allen, A History of Political Thought in the Sixteenth Century, Methuen & Co., London, 1957, p. 309.Google Scholar
  3. 14.
    Christopher Hill, Puritanism and Revolution, Panther Books, London, 1968, PP. 64 ff.Google Scholar
  4. 16.
    H. N. Brailsford, The Levellers and the English Revolution, ed. Christopher Hill, The Cresset Press, London, 1961, p. 130.Google Scholar
  5. 17.
    A. S. P. Woodhouse (ed.), Puritanism and Liberty: Being the Army Debates (1647–9) from the Clarke Manuscripts with Supplementary Documents, London, 1950, p. 96.Google Scholar
  6. 19.
    George H. Sabine (ed.), The Works of Gerrard Winstanley, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1941, PP. 304–5.Google Scholar
  7. 24.
    Jacques Barzun, Race, a Study in Superstition, Revised with a new Preface, New York, 1965, pp. 22–3;Google Scholar
  8. 24.
    Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, George Allen & Unwin, London, 1967, pp. 163–5.Google Scholar
  9. 26.
    Arthur de Gobineau, The Inequality of the Human Races, trans. by Adrian Collins, Howard Fertig, New York, 1967, p. 210.Google Scholar
  10. 29.
    Herbert Spencer, The Man versus the State, With Four Essays on Politics and Society, ed. with an introduction by Donald Macrae, Penguin Books, 1969, pp. 141 ff.Google Scholar
  11. P. Kropotkin, Mutual Aid, a Factor of Evolution, William Heinemann, London, 1904, passim.Google Scholar
  12. 31.
    J. S. McCleland (ed.), The French Right (From De Maistre to Maurras), Jonathan Cape, London, 1970, pp. 91–2.Google Scholar
  13. 32.
    Speech at Chemnitz, 2 April 1938 quoted in Alan Bullock, Hitler, a Study in Tyranny, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1962, p. 398.Google Scholar
  14. 33.
    Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf, trans. by Ralph Manheim, Houghton Miflin Co. Boston & The Riverside Press Cambridge, 1962, p. 285.Google Scholar
  15. 37.
    Alfred Rosenberg, Selected Writings, Edited and introduced by Professor Robert Pois, Jonathan Cape, London, 1970, p. 97.Google Scholar
  16. 40.
    George L. Mosse (ed.), Nazi Culture, Intellectual, Cultural and Soda! Life in the Third Reich, translations by Salvator Attanasio and others, W. H. Allen, London, 1966, p. 326. See also Hitler, op. cit., pp. 509–10.Google Scholar
  17. 43.
    Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels, Selected Works, Vol. 1, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow, 1958, p. 40.Google Scholar
  18. 44.
    Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels, The German Ideology, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1964, p. 44.Google Scholar
  19. 46.
    Karl Marx, Early Writings, trans. & ed. by T. B. Bottomore, C. A. Watts & Co., London, 1963, pp. 124–5.Google Scholar
  20. 49.
    Arthur Bauer, quoted in Chalmers Johnson, Revolutionary Change, University of London Press, London, 1968, p. 1.Google Scholar
  21. 50.
    Friedrich Engels, Anti-Duhring, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow, 1959, p. 391.Google Scholar
  22. 51.
    V. I. Lenin, Collected Works, Vol. 9, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow, 1962, p. 113.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pall Mall Press Ltd London 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry Tudor
    • 1
  1. 1.University of DurhamUK

Personalised recommendations