Theories of National Interest
One of the gravest obstacles to a commonly acceptable definition of national interest is the fundamental disagreement between those who conceive it broadly and hence rather vaguely and those who try to pin it down to a number of concrete single interests, elements, factors, functions or dimensions; all these terms are used without clear distinction in a partly differentiated but mainly overlapping manner.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
3/Theories of National Interest
- 1.Q. by W. J. Mackenzie, Politics and Social Sciences, 1967, p. 359, n. 2.Google Scholar
- 3.R. J. Rummel, “The Relations Between National Attributes and Foreign Conflict Behaviour”, in J. D. Singer (ed.), Quantitative International Relations, 1968.Google Scholar
- 4.They began with Charles A. Beard, The Idea of National Interest: An Analytic & Study of American Foreign Policy 1934. See literature in Rosenau, op. cit.Google Scholar
- 5.Cf. J. S. Hinsley, Sovereignty, 1966Google Scholar
- J. Herz, International Politics in the Nuclear. Age, 1959 and 1963Google Scholar
- E. Cassirer, The Myth of the State, 1946.Google Scholar
- 7.Cf. A. Wolfers, “The Pole of Power and the Pole of Indifference”, Discord and Collaboration, 1967Google Scholar
- J. W. Burton, International Relations: A General Theory, 1965;Google Scholar
- J. Frankel, “Power Politics and Beyond”, Political Studies, June 1966.Google Scholar