Advertisement

Professional Practice

  • Philip Elliott
Chapter
Part of the New Perspectives in Sociology book series (NEPESO)

Abstract

The professions have often been criticised for being over pretentious. Cynics have suggested that no matter how lofty the ideals, given a choice between ideals and self-interest, the latter would prevail. The fact that many of the ideals of professionalism can be shown to bear little relation to the circumstances of ordinary professional practice seems to support their argument. Earlier in this century, when some were prepared to put forward professionalism as a basis for a more just and rational society,1 others countered that professionals were no better than other men and professional association little different from other forms of occupational organisation.2

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 25.
    Burns, T. and Stalker, G. M., ‘The Management of Innovation’ (London, 1961).Google Scholar
  2. 26.
    Etzioni, A., ‘Modern Organisations’ (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1964).Google Scholar
  3. 29.
    Blau, P. M., ‘The Dynamics of Bureaucracy’ (Chicago, 1955).Google Scholar
  4. 32.
    Freidson, Eliot, ‘Patients’ Views of Medical Practice’ (New York, 1961).Google Scholar
  5. 36.
    Becker, H. S. (1952), ‘The Teacher in the Authority System of the Public School’, in ‘Journal of Educational Sociology’, vol. 27 (1953).Google Scholar
  6. 36.
    See also Lortie, D. C., ‘The Balance of Control and Autonomy in Elementary School Teaching’, in Etzioni (ed.) (1969).Google Scholar
  7. 37.
    Fox, R. C., ‘Experiment Perilous’ (Glencoe, III., 1959).Google Scholar
  8. 38.
    Elliott, Philip, ‘Men Against Cancer and the Men and Women AgainstCancer in a Research Institute and Cancer Hospital’. Centre for MassCommunication Research, University of Leicester, 1971 (mimeo).Google Scholar
  9. 54.
    Musgrove, F., ‘The Migratory Elite’ (London, 1963).Google Scholar
  10. 58.
    Eckstein, H., ‘Pressure Group Politics’ (London, 1960); ‘The Politics of the British Medical Association’, reprinted in Rose, R. (ed.), ‘Studies in British Politics’ (London, 1969).Google Scholar
  11. 64.
    Wilson, L., ‘The Academic Man’ (New York, 1942);Google Scholar
  12. 64.
    Caplow, T. and McGee, R. J., ‘The Academic Marketplace’ (New York, 1958); Jencks and Reisman (1968).Google Scholar
  13. 80.
    Cartwright, A., ‘Patients and Their Doctors: A Study of General Practice’ (London, 1967).Google Scholar
  14. 128.
    Kuhn, T., ‘The Structure of Scientific Revolutions’ (Chicago, 1962).Google Scholar
  15. 132.
    Chomsky, N., ‘The New Mandarins’ (Harmondsworth, 1970).Google Scholar
  16. 133.
    Halloran, J. D., Elliott, P. and Murdock, G., ‘Demonstrations and Communication: A Case Study’ (Harmondsworth, 1970).Google Scholar
  17. 139.
    Blauner, R., ‘Alienation and Freedom’ (Chicago, 1964).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Philip Elliott 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Elliott
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Mass Communication ResearchUniversity of LeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations