Advertisement

Introduction

  • Philip Elliott
Chapter
Part of the New Perspectives in Sociology book series (NEPESO)

Abstract

It is one of the clichés of history that the middle classes are always rising. The expansion of professional occupations within the middle class has given a new form to this perpetual historical motion. The growth in the number of professionals and in the number of occupations claiming professional status is one of a number of current processes of social change which have been examined by sociologists. Among these processes professionalisation has received relatively little attention. It would be unreasonable to expect a literature on the sociology of the professions as large as that on urban or industrial sociology. Most people live in cities and work in industry. Nearly a tenth of the employed population of Great Britain and a rather larger proportion of the employed population in the United States of America are members of what the respective census authorities loosely define as professional occupations.1 The rapid increase in the number of people in such occupations is one indication of the importance of the process of professionalisation. A more important reason is that this process is closely linked with various other aspects of social change. The study of professions and professionalism provides a focal point which can show the interconnections between a number of apparently different developments.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Routh, G., ‘Occupation and Pay in Britain 1906–60 (Cambridge, 1965)’; U.S. Bureau of the Census, ‘Statistical Abstract of the United States 1966’, 87th ed. (Washington, D.C., 1966).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marshall, T. H., ‘The Recent History of Professionalism in Relation to Social Structure and Policy’, in ‘Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science’, vol. 5 (1939).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weber, M., ‘The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation’ (London, 1964).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    For a recent discussion, see Nichols, T., ‘Ownership, Control and Ideology’ (London, 1969).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Habenstein, R. W., ‘A Critique of “Profession” as a Sociological Category’, in ‘Sociological Quarterly’, 4 (1963) 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hughes, E. C., ‘Men and their Work’ (Glencoe, 1958).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cogan, M. L., ‘The Problem of Defining a Profession’, in ‘The Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science’, 297 (1955), 105–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    Cogan’s first attempt may be found in ‘Toward a Definition of Profession’, in ‘Harvard Educational Review’, 21 (1953) 33–50.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    See Runciman, W. G., ‘Relative Deprivation and Social Justice’ (London, 1966).Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    Millerson, G., ‘The Qualifying Associations’ (London, 1964), Table 1–1, p. 5.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    Hickson, D. J. and Thomas, M. W., ‘Professionalisation in Britain: A Preliminary Measurement’, in ‘Sociology’, 3 (1969), 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 16.
    Carr-Saunders, A. M. and Wilson, P. A., ‘The Professions’ (London, 1933).Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    Durkheim, E., ‘The Division of Labour in Society’ (London, 1964).Google Scholar
  14. 19.
    Rothblatt, S., ‘The Revolution Among the Dons, Cambridge and Society in Victorian England’ (London, 1968).Google Scholar
  15. 21.
    See, for example, MacIver, R., ‘The Social Significance of Professional Ethics’, in ‘The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science’, 297 (1955) 118–24. This paper was first published in the Annals in 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 22.
    Tawney, R. H., ‘The Acquisitive Society’ (London, 1961; first published 1921).Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    Parsons, T., ‘The Professions and the Social Structure’, in ‘Social Forces’, 17 (1939) 457–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 24.
    Parsons, T., ‘Remarks on Education and the Professions’, in ‘International Journal of Ethics’, 47 (1937) 365.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Philip Elliott 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Elliott
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Mass Communication ResearchUniversity of LeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations